You were posting to a post that RnMom made to me.
You quoted RnMom's post where she referred to be as Wag, so you most certainly mentioned me.
I was responding to someone else entirely, and was referring to this occasional and very odd Roman Catholic reference to "the key" as if it were The Greater Key Of Solomon or something, the key to secret knowledge, the key to all these "mysteries" in the Roman Catholic Church. In case your'e unfamiliar, that's reputedly a kabbalistic magical treatise.
That is a Jewish book from a few centuries ago which has NOTHING to do with the Catholic Church.
That is how it comes across, to me as a Christian who takes no part in that church.
How it "came across"? I was the one asking if RnMom thought it was an actual key.
You don't like what I said, I suggest you address the substance of it, instead of running to mommy.
I didn't run to anyone, I simply pointed out that it was courteous to ping a person you were talking about by name.
As far as addressing it, I have long since given up caring what adjectives are used to defame the Catholic Church.
“Wag” is not your screen name. I made an observation regarding some members of your church, as far as this “key” business. If you feel that this observation applies to you, then it does, but it certainly was not directed at you in particular.
A “key” to knowledge only held by this or that sect has more than just an echo of gnosticism, hence the original observation. Kabbalists predate the publication of the likely-fraudulent book that I mentioned by millenia, as does gnosticism. If this is not what you believe, then advocate what you *do* believe. That’s what I’ve done; I’ve been very frank and forthright.
I expect no less from you.
Since when does not pinging someone to a comment require notification to a Moderator?