**He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named, and found a lot of the very same phrases, scriptures, and ideas that are used to rebut Catholic precepts here on FR are THERE. It certainly appears that while not giving attribution to the unacceptable source, the unacceptable source is being used.**
I am wondering if the Religion Moderator is aware of this. I personally have never checked out that — Not To Be Named” site. You post is very interesting. Thanks for your research.
It is sad
. . . chronically sad . . .
that when Roman Catholics et al appear to be losing
on the playing field of ideas and intellectual discourse
all manner of heavy handed ‘dirty pool’ efforts surface to diminish or assault the opposition.
Very Christian, that.
If you see an unattributed excerpt or article from that or any banned source, send me a Freepmail with the link to the post and to the banned source.
Also, just because a source is banned not everything that source uses as its source is banned. For instance, that particular source also references the Bible which is obviously not banned here.
Finally, a Freeper may arrive at a similar conclusion to one stated on a banned source without actually relying on a banned source. Full preterism for instance is a Christian Identity (banned) belief and therefore raises a red flag with me. So instead of pulling the Freeper's post, I might require him to state his views concerning race, Jews, etc. to make sure he is not Christian Identity. If he does not decry racism and anti-Semitism, then I nuke or ban him.