[reaganaut]

Show me where I have stated that something was lds doctrine or teaching that wasn’t the case, hmmmmmm, rather than waste my time with a regurgitation of the lsd statement of faith. I could, time permitting, easily go line by line and expand the definitions to show the ‘meat’ of those statements.

- - - - -
What really irks me is how deceitful it is to post the AoF and say that is the whole of LDS doctrine. Even the wording of the AoF is deceitful, because they way they word things and redefine terms adds a whole unseen dimension to the statements.

So, I have come to the conclusion that putting the AoF out without clearing up the misleading words, is “Lying for the Lord”.

[Godzilla]

Even the wording of the AoF is deceitful, because they way they word things and redefine terms adds a whole unseen dimension to the statements.

Nor do the AOF really state the full beliefs of the mormon faith. The whole pinnacle of mormonism - the temple - isn't really touched at all.

[Elsie]

Even the wording of the AoF is deceitful, because they way they word things and redefine terms adds a whole unseen dimension to the statements.

"deceitful" will be debated, but AMBIGUOUS is a given!!

Two phrases containing "and so forth" are VERY open-ended!