An attack on the Immaculate Conception and the perpetual virginity of Mary.
The Immaculate Conception doctrine is debatable among Christians, but Mary’s perpetual virginity has always been Christian tradition. To claim that the Bible teaches against it is simply false.
The larger question, I suppose, is why some who imagine themselves Christian feel the need to be so strongly schismatic.
“To claim that the Bible teaches against it is simply false”
Relying on the Infancy Gospel of James? or some false writing like it?
To: The Ignorant Fisherman
An attack on the Immaculate Conception and the perpetual virginity of Mary.
The Immaculate Conception doctrine is debatable among Christians, but Marys perpetual virginity has always been Christian tradition. To claim that the Bible teaches against it is simply false.
The larger question, I suppose, is why some who imagine themselves Christian feel the need to be so strongly schismatic.
————————I don’t understand. Mary had other children, by Joseph, how could she be a perpetual virgin? Yes, at the time of Christ’s immaculate conception, but not with the other children. Right? So no, I did not see this as an attack at all on the immaculate conception. But frankly, I have never heard,read or been told that Mary was always (perpetually) a virgin. Yes, that one immaculate conception is perpetual.(going on for forever). In Christian teachings, reading etc, I am not aware of a ‘tradition’ that you speak of.
To: The Ignorant Fisherman
An attack on the Immaculate Conception and the perpetual virginity of Mary.
The Immaculate Conception doctrine is debatable among Christians, but Marys perpetual virginity has always been Christian tradition. To claim that the Bible teaches against it is simply false.
The larger question, I suppose, is why some who imagine themselves Christian feel the need to be so strongly schismatic.
NOPE.
WRONG AGAIN.
A lie from the deceiver.
A revisionist rubber history deception.