Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: GiovannaNicoletta
I do not believe that an implantable RFID chip could be made to store the actual medical records. I say this for two reasons.

First, medical records are in a state of constant flux, that is they would require updating as you health conditions change. So unless you have a USB 2.0 jack in the end of your finger, that's a problem.

Second, current RFID chips are about the size and shape of a grain of rice and contain a radio receiver (tuned to the scanner) which demodulates a specific frequency to charge a capacitor. When sufficient voltage has accumulated it triggers a short pulse from a micro-transmitter (on a different frequency). The pulse is digitally modulated with a sixteen digit number, which is received by the scanner.

There is no constant supply of power to the device. It is activated only when in close proximity to the scanner (a few inches to a few feet). The intended use of such a device requires that they all operate on the same two frequencies therefore their range must be constrained to very short distances lest an interrogation pulse could trigger multiple chips to respond resulting in a garbled response.

The package size does not leave room for the circuitry necessary for the gigabytes of storage needed to store a complete medical record. It does in fact provide just what its' name says, a radio frequency identification (number). That number would be unique to an individual and serve as a key to enter the actual database containing the relevant medical history.

Having said all that the RFID has a critical vulnerability. Since it derives it's operational power from a pulse at a specific frequency, one has only to expose the device to a somewhat stronger pulse to fry the internal circuitry (specifically the diode demodulator and the storage capacitor). Presto, you have now disappeared permanently from the system, hope you stay healthy.

Regards,
GtG

PS Wrapping you arm (or wherever) in aluminum foil will do the job on a less permanent basis.

43 posted on 04/07/2010 4:46:53 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gandalf_The_Gray
Just another vagrant thought;
Suppose a manufacture of firearms started putting the serial number of your new Glock on an ID chip and molded it into the plastic frame.

A scanner could frisk you as you walked past a patrol car!

I knew I liked metal guns for a reason.

Regards,
GtG

44 posted on 04/07/2010 4:52:13 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray
Oh, none of this has anything to do with aluminum foil.

It's about the fact that Bible prophecy will be fulfilled, it is being fulfilled in our time, there will be an Antichrist, and there will be a mark that this Antichrist forces on everyone on the face of the earth and the fact that those who refuse this mark will be beheaded. Joseph Chambers is not the first person who has written about the possibility or fact that the government takeover of health care involves an implantable chip.

And none of this involves aluminum foil, just facts. These things will happen- you can bet your life on it. This is reality - whether we want to face it or not.

45 posted on 04/07/2010 4:53:24 PM PDT by GiovannaNicoletta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray

First, medical records are in a state of constant flux, that is they would require updating as you health conditions change. So unless you have a USB 2.0 jack in the end of your finger, that’s a problem.

- - - - - -
Actually, not that hard. Think pet chips. There is a code that goes to another computer that has all the info. the Computer file is updated, the chip only has the number.

Add codes, like are already used for medical care, procedures and drugs at hospitals and it would be a snap to update the file on the fly.


51 posted on 04/07/2010 5:16:20 PM PDT by reaganaut (- "I once was lost but now am found, was blind but now I see")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: Gandalf_The_Gray
You are correct on all accounts except the range and the foil.
I have worked with devices that have over 100 meter
range. The dual transceiver systems can triangulate a
receivers location to within 0.5 meters.

"PS Wrapping you arm (or wherever) in aluminum foil will do the job on a less permanent basis."
That wont work.

In order to completely shield the transceiver you
would have to cut off your arm and completely
encase it in metal with no gaps or holes to
leak the rf. Any holes or gaps unless small enough would act
as a waveguide.

69 posted on 04/07/2010 10:07:49 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson