Posted on 03/30/2010 8:51:12 AM PDT by Salvation
Since this most recent attempt to smear Pope Benedict began a couple of weeks ago, I have felt little need to defend him on these pages, because no credible charges had been made against him.
Well today, there still havent been any credible charges made against him, but the attacks keep coming so we have to take action. These attacks on the pope, after all, are at heart attacks on the Church. Look at what David Dayen of the liberal FireDogLake blog wrote:
The cumulative effect of the scandals, across countries and continets, have sapped the pontiffs ability to lead and blown a hole in any effort by the Church to raise morality in any context.
Liberal Andrew Sullivan is writing daily for the resignation of the pope and the end of priestly celibacy. Meanwhile their have been scattered protests in London and a couple other places demanding the popes resignation. But these are the same people who can be counted on to demonstrate/write against the pope or the Church anytime. And when you talk to them, its clear they hate and feel hurt by the Church.
With people writing and doing such preposterous things about and to the Church and the pope, we need to respond with the truth. I find it very interesting that this attack has been leveled at the Church during Holy Week, when the Church is most trying to focus on Christ and His sufferings. Well, this year we can identify with some of His suffering a little more easily.
I am so disappointed, I have to say, with Laurie Goodstein of the New York Times. She should know better, and I think she has done something seriously wrong by being a part of these disingenuous efforts to attack the pope. Fr. Raymond Souza has penned an excellent concise response to her article. He writes: The story is false. It is unsupported by its own documentation. Indeed, it gives every indication of being part of a coordinated campaign against Pope Benedict, rather than responsible journalism. Goodstein used former Archbishop Rembert Weakland as a source for petes sake!
Ive spent years covering stories which attempted to smear the pope. This most recent batch is no different, is is simply more intense. And I sincerely trust and hope the truth will once again come out.
If any real journalist is looking for a story here, Id recommend they look at the behind-the-scenes coordination between the news outlets and demonstrations which are fomenting this story.
Ill write more on this as soon as I get a chance in the meantime Id welcome your (charitable) discussion: What is the most disturbing thing you have seen written or claimed? What is the best defense of the pope you have come across? How have you heard other Catholics reacting to this reporting do they believe the journalists or do they believe the pope?
update more: Ross Douthat has a fairly even treatment of the situation, and what it means in terms of liberal/orthodox tendencies in interpreting it. And veteran Vatican-watcher John Allen documents the swift actions Pope Benedict, as Cardinal Ratzinger, took while in the CDF to address the problem of clergy sexual abuse. Raymond Arroyo has re-published a second op-ed by Fr. de Souza which is excellent.
update 2 if you are looking for more reading, Sean Murphy at Catholic Education Resource Center has written a lengthy (80+ reference) and much shorter response to Christopher Hitchens venemous attack on the pope. George Weigel writes about the Scoundrel [New York] Times at On the Square. Finally, Fr. Longenecker debunks some of the myths surrounding media reports about pedophile priests.
update 3 the Anchoress has a must-read update on this story, leading with this:
Archbishop Timothy Dolan got a stand ovation in the middle of mass, this weekend, for his passionate defense of Pope Benedict XVI against what seems to be a concerted effort to undo his papacy, via distortion and a media rushing-to-judge.
update 4 even more context from John Allen. Damian Thompson is also an essential resource for this story, partly because he lives in the UK where some of the most violent attacks are being made.
Thank goodness Pope Benedict XVI has courageously identified the "filth" in the Church and targeted its removal. The world (particularly the liberal bed-wetting media) hates him for speaking the truth about homosexuality to their 'power'. Yes, there were priests and bishops who abetted homosexuals in the Church. Yes, there were priests and bishops who attempted cover-ups. But there is a new 'sheriff' in town and homosexuals in the priesthood are no longer tolerated.
Here's a first person account which not only corrects the false reporting in the NYT, Fr. Thomas T. Brundage, JCL also sets the record straight regarding Pope Benedict XVI:
Pope Benedict XVI has done more than any other pope or bishop in history to rid the Catholic Church of the scourge of child sexual abuse and provide for those who have been injured ...
To any gays, I say such rage is unbecoming. I am reminded the way the bodysnatchers bayed at normal people in the film!
If only he were younger and less gentle. The way they spoke(speak) of this gentle scholar as the pope’s Rotweiler was(is) so wrong.
You are so right. What an apt description of the man. I have had the privilege of being an arm's length away from him in Rome and about twenty rows away in the National's ballpark for his Washington, D.C. visit.
“Pray for Pope Benedict XVI!!!!”
Yes!
It’s a shame that the NY Times gets any credibility, and the national tv news reports their stories, rather than doing their own research.
Let’s expose the NYTimes for their sloppy “journalism” or downright lies (from link in OP):
“sources were those the Times cited in a story claiming that, as cardinal prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith [CDF], Joseph Ratzinger, later Benedict XVI, had prevented sanctions against Father Lawrence Murphy, a diabolical Milwaukee priest who, decades before, had abused some 200 deaf children in his pastoral care.
This was simply not true, as the legal papers from the Murphy case the Times provided on its Web site demonstrated (see here for a demolition of the Times case based on the documentary evidence it made available). The facts, alas, seem to be of little interest to those whose primary concern is to nail down the narrative of global Catholic criminality, centered in the Vatican.”
excerpt
http://www.firstthings.com/onthesquare/2010/03/scoundrel-times
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.