Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Religion Moderator
This Religion Forum thread is labeled “ecumenical” meaning no antagonism is allowed on this thread.

May I pose a question? I'll use a (hopefully) neutral example:

If an "ecumenical" thread includes a Buddhist, and in response to the Buddhist's claims about the truth and goodness of Buddhism someone posts that Gautama Buddha was a liar, a thief, an adulterer and (in general) a moral monster, then is the poster who is attacking the person of Gautama Buddha being "antagonistic"?

IOW, are ad hominem attacks directed against persons who are not participants on FR allowed?

237 posted on 02/28/2010 1:01:54 PM PST by Poe White Trash (Wake up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies ]


To: Poe White Trash
If another Freeper is upset by remarks about a third party they are antagonistic.

Judgmental remarks about Hitler may not upset anyone. Such remarks about religious authorities might upset some Freepers.

259 posted on 02/28/2010 6:51:33 PM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson