[roamer_1]

And yet it is a logical outcome of individual interpretation. XeniaST (i.e. Uri) has interpreted the bible individually and out of the context of Holy Tradition and has arrived at his conclusion and will label this as sola scriptura.

And UriÂ’el would be correct. In fact, UriÂ’el is quite correct.

If the Father required a Roman Catholic sense of the Trinity, it would be very specifically laid out in the Scriptures. It is *not*. The exact makeup of the Godhead is an unfathomable mystery.

UriÂ’el has taken nothing away from the Scriptures, nor has he added to it. He speaks the Gospel of the Risen Lord.

[xone]

The exact makeup of the Godhead is an unfathomable mystery.

And yet there is the Father/Son/Holy Spirit all in Scripture. Divine names, divine attributes, carrying out divine works, accorded glory, honor and worship which are worthy of God alone.

lcms.org

[Cronos]

If the Father required a Roman Catholic sense of the Trinity, it would be very specifically laid out in the Scriptures. It is *not*. The exact makeup of the Godhead is an unfathomable mystery.

UriÂ’el has taken nothing away from the Scriptures, nor has he added to it. He speaks the Gospel of the Risen Lord

Ok, so you then agree with Uri that "The trinity is not supported by the Holy Word of G-d. " --> What you state is not an exclusively "Roman Catholic" sense of the Trinity, but is a viewpoint shared by Baptists, Anglicans, Lutherans, Reformed, Zwinglists, Methodists, Orthodox, Orientals, Assyrians. This is the majority Christian concept. I'm sure, if you belong to any of the above groups, you have this same "sense of the trinity".

[Uri’el-2012]

And UriÂ’el would be correct. In fact, UriÂ’el is quite correct.

If the Father required a Roman Catholic sense of the Trinity, it would be very specifically laid out in the Scriptures. It is *not*. The exact makeup of the Godhead is an unfathomable mystery.

UriÂ’el has taken nothing away from the Scriptures, nor has he added to it. He speaks the Gospel of the Risen Lord.

Amen ! Brother.

shalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach

[Petronski]

Uri’el has taken nothing away from the Scriptures, nor has he added to it.

But you're wrong.

Ask him to quote Matthew 28:19-20 to you, and you will see that he quite explicitly takes away from Scriptures.