To: the_conscience
Since “anti-Catholic bigotry” means anybody who disagrees with Romanism then I guess the question is will FR become a Romanist tea party? Your definition is wrong, as you know quite well. Any number of FR posters disagree with Catholics, without being bigots. FR is in no danger of becoming a "Romanist tea party." But some people think FR is an anti-Cathoic hate site.
It's no mystery why some are turned off FR as an anti-Catholic hate site: it's the small number of anti-Catholic bigots who cannot seem to let an open thread go by without screaming about Catholics.
722 posted on
02/25/2010 9:11:24 AM PST by
Judith Anne
(2012 Sarah Palin/Duncan Hunter 2012)
To: Judith Anne
“Your definition is wrong, as you know quite well.”
No, I think it’s quite accurate. The Romanists here will tolerate a non-Romanist if they whisper sweet nothings in their ear but not those who actually challenge them on their false gospel.
729 posted on
02/25/2010 9:27:03 AM PST by
the_conscience
(We ought to obey God, rather than men. (Acts 5:29b))
To: Judith Anne; the_conscience; wmfights; Quix; editor-surveyor; UriÂ’el-2012
You need a Free Republic Festivus day for the airing of grievances, I nominate Quix's birthday, carry on
779 posted on
02/25/2010 10:50:16 AM PST by
1000 silverlings
(everything that deceives, also enchants: Plato)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson