To: Judith Anne
“Your definition is wrong, as you know quite well.”
No, I think it’s quite accurate. The Romanists here will tolerate a non-Romanist if they whisper sweet nothings in their ear but not those who actually challenge them on their false gospel.
729 posted on
02/25/2010 9:27:03 AM PST by
the_conscience
(We ought to obey God, rather than men. (Acts 5:29b))
To: the_conscience
The Romanists here will tolerate a non-Romanist if they whisper sweet nothings in their ear but not those who actually challenge them on their false gospel. Nobody is a "Romanist." If you are referring to Catholics, we do tend to like the ones who don't call names, or lie.
733 posted on
02/25/2010 9:33:38 AM PST by
Judith Anne
(2012 Sarah Palin/Duncan Hunter 2012)
To: the_conscience
The Romanists here will tolerate a non-Romanist if they whisper sweet nothings in their ear but not those who actually challenge them on their false gospel.Thank God you're not describing Catholics.
738 posted on
02/25/2010 9:38:03 AM PST by
Petronski
(In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
To: the_conscience
Stop with “the sweet nothings” and see who loves ya now
781 posted on
02/25/2010 10:52:35 AM PST by
1000 silverlings
(everything that deceives, also enchants: Plato)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson