To: Judith Anne
Since “anti-Catholic bigotry” means anybody who disagrees with Romanism then I guess the question is will FR become a Romanist tea party?
700 posted on
02/25/2010 8:44:18 AM PST by
the_conscience
(We ought to obey God, rather than men. (Acts 5:29b))
To: the_conscience
Slight correction . . .
MORE of a Papist tea party.
706 posted on
02/25/2010 8:48:13 AM PST by
Quix
( POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
To: the_conscience
Since “anti-Catholic bigotry” means anybody who disagrees with Romanism then I guess the question is will FR become a Romanist tea party? Your definition is wrong, as you know quite well. Any number of FR posters disagree with Catholics, without being bigots. FR is in no danger of becoming a "Romanist tea party." But some people think FR is an anti-Cathoic hate site.
It's no mystery why some are turned off FR as an anti-Catholic hate site: it's the small number of anti-Catholic bigots who cannot seem to let an open thread go by without screaming about Catholics.
722 posted on
02/25/2010 9:11:24 AM PST by
Judith Anne
(2012 Sarah Palin/Duncan Hunter 2012)
To: the_conscience
Since “anti-Catholic bigotry” means anybody who disagrees with Romanism . . .Not even close.
Anti-Catholic bigotry has nothing to do with Romanism.
It's about hatred of the Catholic Church, not Romanism.
731 posted on
02/25/2010 9:30:06 AM PST by
Petronski
(In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson