To: editor-surveyor; xone
Read in their completeness, the scriptures interpret, and canonize themselves. No one is entitled to their own interpretation. -- what part of "Sorry" did you not understand? And what part of the post to Dr E when I apologized for the statment in 941 did you not understand? Instead you go off on you own trip and come up with your own accusation of No one is entitled to their own interpretation. --> did I say that? No, I didn't
Personal interpretation is exemplified in .... Rev 12 --> that is not "personal" -- that is the interpretation of the Oriental, Assyrian, Orthodox and Catholic Apostolic Church not any one individuals.
Again -- where did I "castigate" anyone who does not believe in the Trinity? I merely asked them to clarify what they believe and why. You accuse me of something I didn't do -- why?
1,180 posted on
02/26/2010 10:37:31 AM PST by
Cronos
(Philipp2:12, 2Cor5:10, Rom2:6, Matt7:21, Matt22:14, Lu12:42-46,John15:1-10,Rev2:4-5,Rev22:19)
To: Cronos
"
that is not "personal" -- that is the interpretation of the Oriental, Assyrian, Orthodox and Catholic Apostolic Church not any one individuals." But it is not in accordance with the harmony of the scriptures. It places Rev 12 at odds with the rest of the word, and there is nothing in Rev 12 itself to lead one in that direction. It is a personal interpretation that has been enforced by political power and decree, and cries out for resolution.
1,245 posted on
02/26/2010 3:30:49 PM PST by
editor-surveyor
(Democracy, the vilest form of government, pits the greed of an angry mob vs. the rights of a man)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson