Posted on 01/23/2010 4:09:32 PM PST by NYer
I commend you because you remember me in everything and maintain the traditions even as I have delivered them to you. 1 Corinthians 11:2
Most Protestant Christians believe that the Bible is the only source concerning faith. According to them, there is no need for Apostolic Tradition or an authoritative, teaching Church. All that they need is the Bible in order to learn about the faith and to live a Christian life. The "Bible Alone" teaching can be appealing in its simplicity, but it suffers from fundamental problems. A few are considered here.
First the Bible itself states that not everything important to the Christian faith is recorded in it. For example, not everything that Christ did is recorded in the inspired Books:
But there are also many other things which Jesus did; were every one of them to be written, I suppose that the world itself could not contain the books that would be written. [John 21:25; RSV]
According to John 20:31, some things have been recorded in the Gospel in order to come to know Christ; however, John 21:25 suggests that there is still more to know about Him. At least for St. John the Apostle, there was more that he needed to teach which was not recorded in the Bible:
I had much to write you, but I would rather not write with pen and ink; I hope to see you soon, and we will talk together face to face. [3 John 13-14]
Also St. Paul instructs Timothy on how to orally pass on the teachings of the faith:
...what you have heard from me before many witnesses entrust to faithful men who will be able to teach others also. [2 Tim. 2:2]
St. Paul even commands (2 Thess. 3:6) the Thessalonian Christians to follow the oral Traditions of the Apostles:
So then, brethren, stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught by us (Apostles), either by word of mouth (oral) or by letter (Epistle). [2 Thess. 2:15]
These commands promoting Oral Tradition would be quite strange, if only the Bible were needed to pass on the entire Christian faith.
A second problem with the "Bible Alone" teaching is canonicity - i.e. which Books belong in the Bible? It must be remembered that the Books of the Bible were written individually along with other religious books. Centuries later the Church compiled together the inspired Books under one cover to form the "Bible." A big question in the early Church was which books are the inspired written Word of God. (Inspired=written by men but authored by God; See Catechism of the Catholic Church 106.)
Scripture did not come with an "inspired" Table of Contents. Nowhere in the sacred texts are all the Books listed. There are some Books cited in the sacred writings but these lists are vague and incomplete (Acts 28:23; 2 Peter 3:16). There are also references to books not found in the Bible, such as St. Paul's Epistle to the Laodiceans (Col. 4:16). St. Paul even encourages the Colossians to read this epistle, but still it is not in the Bible. Jesus in the Gospel never attempts to list the "official" Books of the Old Testament (OT). This issue was hotly debated in His day. Today Protestant and Catholic Christians disagree over which Books belong in the OT. Catholics follow the list in the Septuagint (2nd century B.C. Greek translation of the Hebrew Scripture) while Protestants follow the list used by the Pharisees. A list from Jesus could have eliminated this problem, but no such list is found in the Gospel. As a result the Bible needs a visible authority outside of itself to list the inspired sacred Books. This authority must be guided by the Holy Spirit since these Books are from the Holy Spirit.
Some Christians claim that the Table of Contents in their Bible lists the inspired Books. Even though found in modern Bibles, the Table of Contents is still not inspired. It is not the Word of God but words added later by human editors, much similar to footnotes. The Table of Contents is basically the opinion of the publishing editor. Others may claim that the closing verses in the Book of Revelation, specifically Rev. 22:18-19, cap off the Bible and define all the preceding Books as inspired by God. But do these verses apply to the whole Bible or only the Book of Revelation? Another flaw with this idea is that not all Bibles have the same number of Books. As alluded to above, Catholic and Protestant Bibles contain different numbers of OT Books, yet all these Bibles close with the same verses: Rev. 22:18ff. Both cannot be right. Finally the Book of Deuteronomy contains similar verses (4:2 & 12:32). Does this imply that the Books after Deuteronomy are not inspired by God? No.
A third problem with the "Bible Alone" teaching is proper understanding of critical Bible passages. Most Protestant Christians promote personal interpretation of the Bible, i.e. anyone can interpret these passages by himself. Unfortunately this leads to chaos. For example over Baptism, some Protestants accept the validity of infant Baptism, while others do not. Some believe in the necessity of Baptism for salvation, citing Mark 16:16, while others disagree by citing John 3:16. They all claim to be Bible-based, but still they disagree over fundamental issues regarding salvation. Sadly the "Yellow Pages" phone directory is a witness to the many "Bible-Based" churches who disagree with each other over key issues of the Christian faith. Personal interpretation of the Bible naturally leads to a mire of human doctrines as a result of differing personal opinions.
The Bible was not written as a catechism. It is a collection of many different styles of writing - poetry, history, parables, letters, songs, etc. - requiring different ways of understanding. Sometimes Jesus in the Gospel purposely taught in figurative language and parables, which makes literal interpretation impossible. Even St. Peter admits that St. Paul's Epistles can be difficult to understand:
...Paul wrote to you according to the wisdom given him, speaking of this as he does in all his letters. There are some things in them hard to understand, which the ignorant and unstable twist to their own destruction, as they do the other Scriptures. [2 Peter 3:15-16]
Finally the Ethiopian eunuch in Acts 8:30ff needed St. Philip to explain the Book of Isaiah. Obviously not everyone can understand the meaning of Scripture by simply reading it. More is required. These difficulties in the Bible demand an independent visible teaching authority that is guided by the Holy Spirit.
Even the Bible points to the importance of the Church for teaching the Truth. According to St. Peter in the Bible:
First of all you must understand this, that no prophesy of Scripture is a matter of one's own interpretation, because no prophecy ever came by the impulse of man, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God. [2 Peter 1:20-21]
At least prophecies in the Bible are not a matter of personal interpretation. These prophesies must be properly interpreted by "men moved by the Holy Spirit" since the Holy Spirit is the Author. These "men" are the Bishops of the Church - the successors to the Apostles (Acts 20:28-32). Finally the Bible does not call itself the bulwark of the truth; however, St. Paul does make reference to the Church in those terms:
...the household of God, which is the Church of the living God, the pillar and bulwark of the truth. [1 Tim. 3:15]
According to the Bible, the Church is "the pillar and bulwark of the truth."
All Christians, including Catholics, should read the Bible in order to grow more in the faith; however, we still need the Church. The Church is needed to accurately pass on Apostolic Tradition (Romans 10:17), define the canon of the Bible (i.e. list the inspired Books), safeguard the accurate transmission (e.g. translations) of the Bible and interpret key passages, all with guidance from the Holy Spirit according to God's Will. The Church is needed for other reasons too. It must be understood that the Church is not merely men making arbitrary decisions but men executing authority from God guided by the Holy Spirit. The Church may at times be tested by scandals or scarred by the sins of men. We may sometimes disagree with the policies of the Church, but she is still the instrument of the Holy Spirit. This visible Church is the one built by Jesus Christ on St. Peter, the rock (Matt. 16:18-19; John 1:24). This is the Catholic Church.
And thank you for your testimony, dear brother in Christ!
Kosta has gotten this right and AG has in part as well. The Prodigal is welcomed back. He is not permanently shunned. He is a member of the household, but not a full heir like his brother. This parable carries a bigger message, no?
Might there not be degrees of rewards on God's part? Are some more valiant and committed than others?
Any demand that I "prove" Him is absurd. Thus, I dismiss your questions out-of-hand.
The rest of your post consists of your judgments against God and Christ.
As I said before, God will not justify Himself to you and neither will I.
Hear, I beseech thee, and I will speak: I will demand of thee, and declare thou unto me. I have heard of thee by the hearing of the ear: but now mine eye seeth thee.
Wherefore I abhor [myself], and repent in dust and ashes. - Job 42:1-6
The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, [saying], Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us.
He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision.
Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure. Psalms 2:1-5
Testing your faith is tempting God? LOL. Of course, I should have known, since obviously no one has sufficient faith to walk on water, then we must have a good excuse.
__________
As for the rest of your reply, I don't see any relevance to what I wrote in #1380.
ABSOLUTELY INDEED.
BLESSED BE THE NAME OF THE LORD.
BLESSED BE THE WORD OF THE LORD.
BLESSED BE THE WAYS OF THE LORD.
BLESSED BE THE PLANS OF THE LORD.
BLESSED BE THE DOINGS OF THE LORD.
BLESSED BE THE LORD WHO IS RIGHTEOUS IN ALL HIS WAYS.
Occasionally, in my life,
I’ve come across folks who’ve made it a hobby if not a vocation to try and stick their fingers in God’s eyes.
Usually, while ranting about His nonexistence.
Somewhat more rarely, I’ve had the impression that such folks were skating on extremely thin ice . . . not just that on judgment day would they find things hotter than they wished . . . but a lot sooner than they might imagine in their worst nightmares.
It’s always shocked me a bit how utterly ignorant of such hazards some such folks were.
Truly the Scripture is accurate . . . avoid bothering or being concerned about the wicked . . . for essentially, they are less substantial than a rare Phoenix fox and less durable as well.
Was it Johnathan Edwards who preached so movingly about how frightful it was to fall into the hands of an angry God Almighty . . . for spurning His Son’s Salvation.
It would appear that some folks NEVER learned the least bit of sanity about any kind of authority.
Sometimes, that seems to come from abusive parents from an early age. Sometimes it seems to come from parents who were laisez faire to the max and/or also hostile to the notion of God themselves.
Such offspring seem to chronically have troubled relationships with people in addition to being estranged from God.
And !!!!CONTROL!!!! issues are rampant points of friction.
Fascinating phenomenon that seems to be manifesting in more and more lives.
As Scripture predicted for this era . . . lawlessness and affrontery to God Almighty is building toward a maxed-out crescendo.
God have mercy.
And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband.
And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God [is] with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, [and be] their God. And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away.
And he that sat upon the throne said, Behold, I make all things new. And he said unto me, Write: for these words are true and faithful.
And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely. He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son.
But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death. - Revelation 21:1-8
And the nations of them which are saved shall walk in the light of it: and the kings of the earth do bring their glory and honour into it. And the gates of it shall not be shut at all by day: for there shall be no night there. And they shall bring the glory and honour of the nations into it.
And there shall in no wise enter into it any thing that defileth, neither [whatsoever] worketh abomination, or [maketh] a lie: but they which are written in the Lamb's book of life. - Revelation 21:22-27
God's Name is I AM.
So I guess I see this story somewhat differntly than some others may. It gives me hope and encouragement and in no way, I think, excuses or looks lightly on sin. It is a story of grace.
I see spiritual rebellion as a "sign of the times."
You might want to read the whole chapter. It is both prophetic of the end-time to come (the tribulation) and of the overthrow by the Medes and Persians after the Babylonian rule.
Then why bring up "risks" of doubting afterlife?
Thankfully, you and your posts are FAR from the highest priority in my life . . . as disappointing as that may be to you
I knew the best way to get you out of my hair was to start replying to your unceasing and unsolicited verbose fluff. Which is why I started replying to you.
I hope to get to them by Friday evening . . . assuming other priorities dont intervene.
Oh, sure, I ask you a simple question and you are coming up with every kind of excuse, when otherwise not even polite requests can stop you from posting and avalanche of your nonsense to me!
Well, you wanted to talk, you baited and baited, and insinuated and provoked...with you silly posts, and now you are too "busy" to answer a simple question? Pathetic.
The Bible speaks of the "testing" of our faith but it is speaking of refining it like gold is refined to remove impurities. What I think you may be implying is that we can test God. This is what satan tried to do with Jesus after he was in the wilderness fasting for forty days. Not the same thing at all. Pretty sure though, after Peter got dunked for taking his eyes off the Lord that time on the water - although he did walk on the water some, if Jesus had given the chance again, I guarantee, he'd stay dry!
Quite so.
Quite soberingly so.
Thanks for your kind replies.
Sounds like some assumption modules
were aborted
or
mangled
or
the afterbirth was installed instead of the module proper.
Actually, I think it’s a blessing to work part time . . .
not pathetic.
I do see quite a lot of pathetic on this thread, however.
What about the parable of the workers who were told they would get paid a certain amount for working a day in the field. Then, close to the end of the workday, another one shows up and he gets paid the same amount as others who worked there the entire day!
And what about king Solomon? Or his father David? Or the man who out of gratitude of God offers God the first thing he sees when he gets home and it turns out to be his beloved daughter. And God kills this man's daughter! Or Job? Job's reward is a new family and new cattle, like you can replace your loved ones...But he had mercy on Abraham for his faith...give me a break. It makes my skin itch.
Might there not be degrees of rewards on God's part?
Where? On earth or in the "afterlife?" Well, for sure it's not here on earth, for god rewards the righteous and the unrighteous, an his sun shines on both. But the Bible tells you not to worry if you get the shaft in this life, you will be like that beggar Lazarus, in "Abraham's bosom," while all the fat cats who did you wrong will be burning...unless they repent, of course at the last moment. Then it's just tough luck for you.
I am pretty sure there is no more important thing to humans than forgiveness.. whether you are christian or not..
The lack of forgiveness has made more people miserable and miserable to be around than anything I know..
The lack of forgiveness can plunge you into a "lake of fire" as surely as falling overboard.. for it is indeed a "fire".. a consuming fire..
If you can only teach your children ONE THING.. it should be to forgive freely and wisely.. You can remember as you wish without forgiveness at your own peril.. Forgiveness will heal your own mind.. A forgiving heart is not like a medicine, it is a medicine.. A medicine that casts out many demons..
The ONLY way to teach forgiveness is by doing it.. I don't know how anybody makes it without faith..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.