[Dr. Eckleburg]

And the BLOG that Dr. E said was an "official Vatican website" is good?

Gosh. You've repeated this error all over the place. Please quote me correctly.

I said the Legion of Mary was sanctioned by the Vatican which it is. We can assume that blog is likewise sanctioned by Rome since it appears to be one of the many chapters of the Vatican-sanctioned Legion of Mary scattered throughout the world.

Just not scattered far enough.

[Cronos]

We can assume that blog is likewise sanctioned by Rome since it appears to be one of the many chapters of the Vatican-sanctioned Legion of Mary scattered throughout the world.

The assumption made is wrong -- the Vatican does not "sanction" or "authorize" blogs of the various lay groups of Christians worldwide.

[RnMomof7]

I said the Legion of Mary was sanctioned by the Vatican which it is. We can assume that blog is likewise sanctioned by Rome since it appears to be one of the many chapters of the Vatican-sanctioned Legion of Mary scattered throughout the world.

It probably does not have an imprimatur on every article, so that is why Catholics would say it is not sanctioned. But if that is true I wonder why observant Catholics read any blogs because they are not approved teachings and could be in error???

One thing to add is the pope recently asked catholics to be more active on the internet ... so although this may not be an "official" site it is in line with the popes request

[Petronski]

I said the Legion of Mary was sanctioned by the Vatican which it is. We can assume that blog is likewise sanctioned by Rome...