[John Leland 1789]

” I have proven you wrong.”

---

You haven’t PROVEN anything; you’ve only delivered the “SEE”s mail for them. Just because you say to me, “You are incorrect,” doesn’t make you correct.

The “SEE” does not want any believers to show up in NW Europe before its priests get there, but that does not mean they weren’t there.

[Mad Dawg]

Shoot and move, shoot and move.

The “SEE” does not want any believers to show up in NW Europe before its priests get there, but that does not mean they weren’t there.

Maybe you'd better restate your thesis. This quote shows that it is not yet formed enough to debate. The timing of the arrival of presbyters was not, I think, part of the original contention.

Shifting your contention may be a good was to gain a kind of illusory upper hand in a discussion but it has nothing to do with the truth.

[Cronos]

your Question was “There were people and groups in N-W EUrope that did not know of the See of Rome”. I have proven you wrong. Do you retract your earlier, incorrect statement?

Do you even have any proof for this? Or just spout strangely disjointed words?

[Cronos]

So, you have any proof for your statement about Czechs forming Churchs in 45 AD? your Question was “There were people and groups in N-W EUrope that did not know of the See of Rome”. That is flat out, historically, WRONG.