[Cronos]

Many here do not seem to grasp that fact that when they make an outrageous claim, it then becomes THEIR RESPONSIBILITY to prove it.

Yes, that seems to be quite a lot of that going around here, and it shows a lack of knowledge in scripture, history and even geography. They seem to think that they can spout any rot without proof and that's ok.

[markomalley]

Yes, that seems to be quite a lot of that going around here, and it shows a lack of knowledge in scripture, history and even geography. They seem to think that they can spout any rot without proof and that's ok.

There are a lot of folks who are simply trolls, practicing their own little version of taqiyya.

We can have perfectly fine discussions about theology while sticking with the facts. Resorting to deceptions and plagiarisms are the best indications of a bankrupt argument. Those lies need to be confronted.

But once their calumnies have been exposed, DNFTT (IMHO)

[Quix]

You are quite welcome to disbelieve my perspective.

You are evidently much more “expert” on such topics and issues than I am.

Nevertheless, I believe my perspective to be sufficiently correct to remain in tact.

Actually, I think there’s much more evidence for my perspective than there is for Mary’s sinlessness and than there is for her “Assumption.”

It’s so fascinating . . . the Vatican et al seem to be persistently, narrowly, rigidly on the side of issues of questionable . . .

!!!!TRADITIONs!!!!

I think Paul’s CHRIST AND HIM CRUCIFIED is a much more

BIBLICAL

and a much more RELIABLE doctrine, dogma and perspective.

A LOT else is chaff.