[the_conscience]

I keep forgetting that Romanists are unable to interpret “subtleties” of context. I suppose that’s why they always need to refer back to Rome to understand Scripture.

[Hegewisch Dupa]

more like when people need to play games to turn ‘call no man father’ into ‘call no priest Father’ - that’s pretty straight-forward. Or wine = grape juice. Sure - perfectly straight forward.

[Mad Dawg]

I suppose that’s why they always need to refer back to Rome to understand Scripture.

Okay. What does your wisdom tell you about why so many non-Catholics need to spread falsehoods about us?

Look, enough. Here's the deal. For many of us, to use the word "irregardless" is to make an embarrassing mistake. There's "irrespective" and there's "regardless". There's no "irregardless," most people think.

Now I also had an impulse to jab you over your error, but I decided it wouldn't help anything and wouldn't move the topic.

But then you go with the old falsehood about needing to refer back to Rome to understand the Scripture. And I realize that I'm refraining from mocking someone for a real error he made, while he makes imaginary charges against me.

So that's part of what's going on here.

Why don't you tell me some more about things I never said and how I can't read Scripture? Then you could say some stuff about shrillness.

[Natural Law]

"I keep forgetting that Romanists are unable to interpret “subtleties” of context."

You don't do subtelties. You have been adivsed numerous times that the term "Romanist" is derogatory and yet you willfully continue to use it. Your choice of words communicates amore clearly than the order in which you assemble them. The choice of these abrasive and inflammatory terms is taken personally as would RC, Kike, Hebe, Bible Thumper, Jesus Freak, Campbellite, Fundie, Happy Clapper, Holy Roller, Hun, Orangie, Proddy Dog, Russellite, Towel Head, Left Footer, Wasp, Dunkers, etc.

[Cronos]

Heg: You'll have a much easier time convincing people you can interpret the intricacies of scripture once you convince them you can handle the "subtleties" of the dictionary.

t_c: I keep forgetting that Romanists are unable to interpret “subtleties” of context. I suppose that’s why they always need to refer back to Rome to understand Scripture

Non-sequitur. HD pointed out that you would need to handle the "subtleties" of the dictionary since there was singular lack of that in your previous post and you turn that on him that he is unable to interpret subtleties?