And let the record show, should affronted Calvinists whine to the Religion Moderator, that Gamecock was the first on this thread to personalize what was up to that point a discussion of the historical merits of the Haaretz article’s reasoning about the leper shroud.
Gamecock accused us of making our faith depend on a piece of cloth.
That’s a falsehood, because our faith does not depend on the Shroud. Gamecock knows it’s a falsehood. It was done to inflame. Gamecock sent his reply to his fellow Calvinists to invite them to hijack this thread.
I did not personalize this.
Gamecock accused us of making our faith depend on a piece of cloth.
That’s a falsehood, because our faith does not depend on the Shroud. Gamecock knows it’s a falsehood. It was done to inflame. Gamecock sent his reply to his fellow Calvinists to invite them to hijack this thread.
I did not personalize this.
BWA HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Who is us? There are plenty of non-Catholics who have a fascination with the shroud, including Evangelicals.
It was done to inflame.
Gee, that sounds like mindreading, which is strictly forbidden 'round these parts.
Gamecock sent his reply to his fellow Calvinists to invite them to hijack this thread.
Sounds like mindreading.
Besides, this wasn't tagged as anything (devotional, Catholic caucus, etc) which makes it open. Want a closed thread? There are plenty of mechanisms to keep we evil Calvinists out.