Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: PanzerKardinal
To make the news at Christmas it seems a priest just needs to question the literalness of a virgin giving birth. Many in society mistakenly think that to challenge literalism is to challenge the norms of Christianity. What progressive interpretations try to do however is remove the supernatural obfuscation and delve into the deeper spiritual truth of this festival.

Sounds like the way most Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Anglicans, and mainline Protestants interpret Genesis.

I wonder what the good "progressive" bishop thinks of the supernatural obfuscation of Maori creation myths. Suppose he'd ridicule them?

Christian fundamentalism believes a supernatural male God who lived above sent his sperm into the womb of the virgin Mary. Although there were a series of miraculous events surrounding Jesus’ birth – like wandering stars and angelic choirs – the real miracle was his death and literal resurrection 33 years later. The importance of this literal resurrection is the belief that it was a cosmic transaction whereby the male God embraced humanity only after being satiated by Jesus’ innocent blood.

This forum is crawling with militant "orthodox chr*stians" who believe all the above but who insist that cannot be "fundamentalists" because they do not believe Genesis is literally true.

I'm still trying to figure out why a literal six day creation that concluded just 5769+ years ago is any more irrational than a virgin birth.

9 posted on 12/16/2009 7:57:41 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Vaya`an Yosef 'et-Par`oh le'mor bil`aday; 'Eloqim ya`aneh 'et-shelom Par`oh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Zionist Conspirator

12 posted on 12/16/2009 8:00:21 AM PST by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Zionist Conspirator
I'm still trying to figure out why a literal six day creation that concluded just 5769+ years ago is any more irrational than a virgin birth.

I just might have something to do with the fact that we have the earth and, oh the whole rest of the universe, to examine in regard to the facts of its creation. Mary's not around anymore (nor any Jesus DNA) to examine scientifically.

28 posted on 12/16/2009 8:21:53 AM PST by Hegewisch Dupa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Zionist Conspirator

the supernatural obfuscation of Maori creation myths.
_________________________________________________

You leave Kupe and his canoe and the big fish alone...

:)


48 posted on 12/16/2009 8:46:23 AM PST by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Zionist Conspirator
I'm still trying to figure out why a literal six day creation that concluded just 5769+ years ago is any more irrational than a virgin birth.

FWIW, you're right.

99 posted on 12/16/2009 11:41:20 AM PST by wmfights (If you want change support SenateConservatives.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson