Skip to comments.
Upheaval in the Anglican communion over lesbian bishop
Inside Catholic ^
| December 7, 2009
| Margaret Cabaniss
Posted on 12/07/2009 2:58:05 PM PST by NYer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-125 next last
To: Poe White Trash; Alex Murphy
Of course it would occasion dispute, since such expressions are being proffered in an apologetic spirit, not in a spirit of seeking truth and clarity. I'll supply you with a months free beer or wine if you can link me to anything in this forum which is not proffered in an "apologetic spirit". BTW, as Alex is fond of reminding us, intimating that I'm not "seeking truth and clarity" is making it about me, reading my mind, if you will and that, apparently, is a no-no.......right Alex?
So provide some "truth and clarity".
I've asked Alex on multiple occasions for the correct number and received no reply.
It's a straightforward question.
How many are there?
Or is it such a sore point that you don't wish to discuss it?
41
posted on
12/08/2009 12:00:24 PM PST
by
marshmallow
("A country which kills its own children has no future" -Mother Teresa of Calcutta)
To: NYer
A Catholic-Orthodox Joint declaration of 1965 lifted the mutual excommunications dating from 1054.This is from your own link:
5. Pope Paul VI and Patriarch Athenagoras I with his synod realize that this gesture of justice and mutual pardon is not sufficient to end both old and more recent differences between the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church.
Get back to me when the Eucumenical Patriarch of Constantinople recognizes the papal plenitudo potestas, or when the Bishop of Rome formally removes the filioque from the Creed. I'll wait.
To: marshmallow
I'll supply you with a months free beer or wine if you can link me to anything in this forum which is not proffered in an "apologetic spirit".Don't be modest -- this part of your post is a fine example of truth and clarity!
I agree with you for the most part, except I believe that T&C show up more often than one might expect. Even on Religion threads.
I try my best. Others do, too. Sometimes truth and clarity just pop up by accident.
How many are there?
I'm not a sociologist of religion, and have no idea.
Or is it such a sore point that you don't wish to discuss it?
Oops! You're getting to be "apologetic" again! Not a sore point, just don't want to stray too far from my "reading list."
To: marshmallow; Religion Moderator
....as Alex is fond of reminding us, intimating that I'm not "seeking truth and clarity" is making it about me, reading my mind, if you will and that, apparently, is a no-no.......right Alex? That would be the Religion Moderator who reminds you about all of those things. Saying that I am "fond of reminding you" about them would be "making it about personal" and would be "reading my mind".
44
posted on
12/08/2009 12:50:55 PM PST
by
Alex Murphy
("Though He slay me, yet will I trust Him" - Job 13:15)
To: Poe White Trash
45
posted on
12/08/2009 12:54:33 PM PST
by
NYer
("One Who Prays Is Not Afraid; One Who Prays Is Never Alone" - Benedict XVI)
To: Poe White Trash
I'm not a sociologist of religion, and have no idea. Thank you.
I appreciate the honesty.
46
posted on
12/08/2009 12:56:33 PM PST
by
marshmallow
("A country which kills its own children has no future" -Mother Teresa of Calcutta)
To: Alex Murphy
Saying that another Freeper personally “is fond” of a thing is reading his mind and therefore “making it personal.”
To: Alex Murphy; Religion Moderator
That would be the Religion Moderator who reminds you about all of those things. Saying that I am "fond of reminding you" about them would be "making it about personal" and would be "reading my mind". My humble apologies.
The word "fond" is indeed a form of mind reading.
I should have said "....as Alex frequently reminds us.....".
48
posted on
12/08/2009 1:02:32 PM PST
by
marshmallow
("A country which kills its own children has no future" -Mother Teresa of Calcutta)
To: marshmallow
Post 47 should have been addressed to you.
To: NYer
Whats your point?The obvious point that, all "gestures" aside, the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church are still in schism, something my Eastern Orthodox friends are always quick to point out to me. And that this schism entails that each side thinks the other is deep in error to the extent that to say that they share a "common faith" in any real sense in absurd.
To: Religion Moderator; Alex Murphy
I must not say Alex is "fond" of anything.
I must not say Alex is "fond" of anything.
I must not say Alex is "fond" of anything.
I must not say Alex is "fond" of anything.
I must not say Alex is "fond" of anything.
I must not say Alex is "fond" of anything.
I must not say Alex is "fond" of anything...........
51
posted on
12/08/2009 1:11:03 PM PST
by
marshmallow
("A country which kills its own children has no future" -Mother Teresa of Calcutta)
To: marshmallow
To: Poe White Trash
The obvious point that, all "gestures" aside, the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church are still in schism, something my Eastern Orthodox friends are always quick to point out to me. And that this schism entails that each side thinks the other is deep in error to the extent that to say that they share a "common faith" in any real sense in absurd. And your response to them is:
"It is to Peter that he says: You are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church [Matt. 16:18]. Where Peter is, there is the Church. And where the Church is, no death is there, but life eternal" (Commentary on Twelve Psalms of David 40:30 [A.D. 389]).
Ambrose of Milan
53
posted on
12/08/2009 3:20:50 PM PST
by
NYer
("One Who Prays Is Not Afraid; One Who Prays Is Never Alone" - Benedict XVI)
To: NYer
And your response to them is...MY response? I have no brief to defend the Bishop of Rome's claims.
As for what I take to be your response, I've read that it doesn't work to well amongst the Eastern Orthodox crowd, especially in regards to the two points I addressed.
To: MWS
question -- if I may, what is the Anglican Church in NA's stance on:
- Priestesses?
- Abortion
- Transubstantian
- Episcopal hierachy
- Divorce
- Contraception
- Homersexuals (practising and non-p)
55
posted on
12/09/2009 5:28:23 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Nuke Mecca NOW!!!<img src="http://shiitehappens.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/bomb_mecca450.jpg" />)
To: Alex Murphy; NYer; Mr Rogers; Iscool; Dr. Eckleburg; Gamecock; HarleyD; Ottofire; Frumanchu; ...
The number of Protestant groups and sub-groups is in the thousands -- right down to the Western Branch of the Presbylutheran Orthodox Congregational Church.
Each Prot group splits and re-splits every time they meet a new Benny Hinn.
56
posted on
12/09/2009 5:32:26 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Nuke Mecca NOW!!!<img src="http://shiitehappens.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/bomb_mecca450.jpg" />)
To: RonF; NYer
One FAITH eliminates the acceptability of multiple denominations because we can't have one faith that believes both in marriage = man + woman and at the same time doesn't believe that.
Also, there are basic incompatibilities like between Orthodoxy and the beliefs of the Mormons or Jehovah's Witnesses or Christian Scientists
And there are incompatibilities between Orthodox beliefs and those held by unitarians
and there are incompatibilities between Orthodox belief and the belief in a deity that controls our actions and makes us do evil and then sends us to heck.
57
posted on
12/09/2009 5:42:29 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Nuke Mecca NOW!!!<img src="http://shiitehappens.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/bomb_mecca450.jpg" />)
To: marshmallow; Alex Murphy; NYer
The thing is that Alex can't give you an accurate number beyond 30,000 as the various groups split and re-split and join and split and split some more like amoebae.
So you have the PCUSA, then the APC, then the BPC, then the OPC, then the reformation of the PCUSA, then....
58
posted on
12/09/2009 5:45:20 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Nuke Mecca NOW!!!<img src="http://shiitehappens.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/bomb_mecca450.jpg" />)
To: RonF
Note -- Priestly celibacy is a discipline, not a basic dogma.
We do have married priests in the Eastern Catholic Churches like the Maronites, Syro-Malabars etc. And we do have married priests that have been accepted from the Anglicans.
That doesn't contradict any basic dogma of The Church
59
posted on
12/09/2009 5:47:33 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Nuke Mecca NOW!!!<img src="http://shiitehappens.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/bomb_mecca450.jpg" />)
To: Poe White Trash; NYer
The Church Western and Eastern are officially not in schism. None of the Orthodox would say otherwise. The two are not, however, in communion, but they are not in schism.
60
posted on
12/09/2009 5:52:14 AM PST
by
Cronos
(Nuke Mecca NOW!!!<img src="http://shiitehappens.files.wordpress.com/2008/12/bomb_mecca450.jpg" />)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-125 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson