Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Natural Law
Ironically, and unknown to non-scientific types, theories evolve and get refined as new data becomes available. Because Darwin did not have benefit of a thorough knowledge of DNA is meaningless. Even today there is still an incomplete understanding of DNA.

I agree. Someday soon the weight of scientific evidence bolstering creation will be such that there will be no denying its source. When that happens scientific understanding and knowledge will make what we currently know look like the dark ages.

24 posted on 11/07/2009 9:16:28 AM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: DouglasKC
"Someday soon the weight of scientific evidence bolstering creation will be such that there will be no denying its source."

Too bad too much of this discussion is binary. Too often those who don't accept the abracadabra event of creation are labeled heretics. That includes those of us, including Charles Darwin, who fully accept that God created all life and used the process of evolution to do it.

27 posted on 11/07/2009 9:24:13 AM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson