Despite your most earnest efforts to instruct the unlearned, no doubt...
PT, you've managed to embrace Feeneyism and violate a Decree of the Council of Trent in just a few short paragraphs.
And you have chosen to preen rather than think. I already demonstrated how you can not substantiate your claim of "contradiction" in violation Trent, nor can you demonstrate Feenyism without ignoring my qualifier in taking up YOUR challenge.
Now, let us demonstrate your incompetence with "Homily VI on Titus."
Would you argue there is, in principle "nothing to be gained" by answering whether it is Rome or The East that is in error?
What manner of "admonishment" have YOU brought to the table aside from an exceedingly verbose "nuh-uh!" with a dash of "you're dumb, and nobody likes you?"
By all means, quote the saints, but like Otto from "A Fish Called Wanda," orangutans may quote Nietzsche, "they just don't understand him."
Before you go on any further, it is time perhaps for you to demonstrate just whose teaching do you espouse here other than your own? Which Pope of Council or Magisterial pronouncmeent expresses your views on this subject? I think it is disingenuous for you to ask for evidence when you have none to offer to back up the interpretations you are spouting.