Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: TheThirdRuffian
“They placed a linen sheet flat over a volunteer and then rubbed it with a pigment containing traces of acid. A mask was used for the face. The pigment was then artificially aged by heating the cloth in an oven and washing it, a process which removed it from the surface but left a fuzzy, half-tone image similar to that on the Shroud. He believes the pigment on the original Shroud faded naturally over the centuries.”

We know what the image is made of and there are no pigments involved. The Shroud has been examined with very sophisticated instruments and all of them have failed to find any pigments on the Shroud that correspond to the location of the image.

The copy made by Garlaschelli apparently approximates only ONE of the multitude of characteristics of the Shroud... the evanescent image. This has been done before... and none of the techniques have yet met all of the criteria for duplicating the Shroud... one of which is the lack of pigments down to the electron microscope level.

166 posted on 10/05/2009 12:53:03 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker

It’s a stain, not a pigment. The “acid” is lemon juice.

It’s an old technique for the transfer of images to fabric (or paper or anything else).


174 posted on 10/05/2009 12:57:37 PM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (Nothing to see here. Move along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
I am really glad you showed up on the thread. It is amazing to see this story fall to pieces with only a minor effort to bring forth real facts.
395 posted on 10/06/2009 3:26:40 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson