Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Salvation Outside the Church
Catholic Answers ^ | 12/05 | Fr. Ray Ryland

Posted on 06/27/2009 10:33:55 PM PDT by bdeaner



Why does the Catholic Church teach that there is "no salvation outside the Church"? Doesn’t this contradict Scripture? God "desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth" (1 Tim. 2:4). "I am the way, and the truth, and the life; no one comes to the Father, but by me" (John 14:6). Peter proclaimed to the Sanhedrin, "There is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved" (Acts 4:12).

Since God intends (plans, wills) that every human being should go to heaven, doesn’t the Church’s teaching greatly restrict the scope of God’s redemption? Does the Church mean—as Protestants and (I suspect) many Catholics believe—that only members of the Catholic Church can be saved?

That is what a priest in Boston, Fr. Leonard Feeney, S.J., began teaching in the 1940s. His bishop and the Vatican tried to convince him that his interpretation of the Church’s teaching was wrong. He so persisted in his error that he was finally excommunicated, but by God’s mercy, he was reconciled to the Church before he died in 1978.

In correcting Fr. Feeney in 1949, the Supreme Congregation of the Holy Office (now the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) issued a document entitled Suprema Haec Sacra, which stated that "extra ecclesiam, nulla salus" (outside the Church, no salvation) is "an infallible statement." But, it added, "this dogma must be understood in that sense in which the Church itself understands it."

Note that word dogma. This teaching has been proclaimed by, among others, Pope Pelagius in 585, the Fourth Lateran Council in 1214, Pope Innocent III in 1214, Pope Boniface VIII in 1302, Pope Pius XII, Pope Paul VI, the Second Vatican Council, Pope John Paul II, and the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in Dominus Iesus.

Our point is this: When the Church infallibly teaches extra ecclesiam, nulla salus, it does not say that non-Catholics cannot be saved. In fact, it affirms the contrary. The purpose of the teaching is to tell us how Jesus Christ makes salvation available to all human beings.

Work Out Your Salvation

There are two distinct dimensions of Jesus Christ’s redemption. Objective redemption is what Jesus Christ has accomplished once for all in his life, death, resurrection, and ascension: the redemption of the whole universe. Yet the benefits of that redemption have to be applied unceasingly to Christ’s members throughout their lives. This is subjective redemption. If the benefits of Christ’s redemption are not applied to individuals, they have no share in his objective redemption. Redemption in an individual is an ongoing process. "Work out your own salvation in fear and trembling; for God is at work in you" (Phil. 2:12–13).

How does Jesus Christ work out his redemption in individuals? Through his mystical body. When I was a Protestant, I (like Protestants in general) believed that the phrase "mystical body of Christ" was essentially a metaphor. For Catholics, the phrase is literal truth.

Here’s why: To fulfill his Messianic mission, Jesus Christ took on a human body from his Mother. He lived a natural life in that body. He redeemed the world through that body and no other means. Since his Ascension and until the end of history, Jesus lives on earth in his supernatural body, the body of his members, his mystical body. Having used his physical body to redeem the world, Christ now uses his mystical body to dispense "the divine fruits of the Redemption" (Mystici Corporis 31).

The Church: His Body

What is this mystical body? The true Church of Jesus Christ, not some invisible reality composed of true believers, as the Reformers insisted. In the first public proclamation of the gospel by Peter at Pentecost, he did not invite his listeners to simply align themselves spiritually with other true believers. He summoned them into a society, the Church, which Christ had established. Only by answering that call could they be rescued from the "crooked generation" (Acts 2:40) to which they belonged and be saved.

Paul, at the time of his conversion, had never seen Jesus. Yet recall how Jesus identified himself with his Church when he spoke to Paul on the road to Damascus: "Why do you persecute me?" (Acts 9:4, emphasis added) and "I am Jesus, whom you are persecuting" (Acts 9:5). Years later, writing to Timothy, Paul ruefully admitted that he had persecuted Jesus by persecuting his Church. He expressed gratitude for Christ appointing him an apostle, "though I formerly b.asphemed and persecuted and insulted him" (1 Tim. 1:13).

The Second Vatican Council says that the hierarchical structure of the Catholic Church and the mystical body of Christ "form one complex reality that comes together from a human and a divine element" (Lumen Gentium 8). The Church is "the fullness of him [Christ] who fills all in all" (Eph. 1:23). Now that Jesus has accomplished objective redemption, the "plan of mystery hidden for ages in God" is "that through the Church the manifold wisdom of God might now be made known to the principalities and powers in the heavenly places" (Eph. 3:9–10).

According to John Paul II, in order to properly understand the Church’s teaching about its role in Christ’s scheme of salvation, two truths must be held together: "the real possibility of salvation in Christ for all humanity" and "the necessity of the Church for salvation" (Redemptoris Missio 18). John Paul taught us that the Church is "the seed, sign, and instrument" of God’s kingdom and referred several times to Vatican II’s designation of the Catholic Church as the "universal sacrament of salvation":

"The Church is the sacrament of salvation for all humankind, and her activity is not limited only to those who accept her message" (RM 20).

"Christ won the Church for himself at the price of his own blood and made the Church his co-worker in the salvation of the world. . . . He carries out his mission through her" (RM 9).

In an address to the plenary assembly of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (January 28, 2000), John Paul stated, "The Lord Jesus . . . established his Church as a saving reality: as his body, through which he himself accomplishes salvation in history." He then quoted Vatican II’s teaching that the Church is necessary for salvation.

In 2000 the CDF issued Dominus Iesus, a response to widespread attempts to dilute the Church’s teaching about our Lord and about itself. The English subtitle is itself significant: "On the Unicity and Salvific Universality of Jesus Christ and the Church." It simply means that Jesus Christ and his Church are indivisible. He is universal Savior who always works through his Church:

The only Savior . . . constituted the Church as a salvific mystery: He himself is in the Church and the Church is in him. . . . Therefore, the fullness of Christ’s salvific mystery belongs also to the Church, inseparably united to her Lord (DI 18).

Indeed, Christ and the Church "constitute a single ‘whole Christ’" (DI 16). In Christ, God has made known his will that "the Church founded by him be the instrument for the salvation of all humanity" (DI 22). The Catholic Church, therefore, "has, in God’s plan, an indispensable relationship with the salvation of every human being" (DI 20).

The key elements of revelation that together undergird extra ecclesiam, nulla salus are these: (1) Jesus Christ is the universal Savior. (2) He has constituted his Church as his mystical body on earth through which he dispenses salvation to the world. (3) He always works through it—though in countless instances outside its visible boundaries. Recall John Paul’s words about the Church quoted above: "Her activity is not limited only to those who accept its message."

Not of this Fold

Extra ecclesiam, nulla salus does not mean that only faithful Roman Catholics can be saved. The Church has never taught that. So where does that leave non-Catholics and non-Christians?

Jesus told his followers, "I have other sheep, that are not of this fold; I must bring them also, and they will heed my voice. So there shall be one flock, one shepherd" (John 10:16). After his Resurrection, Jesus gave the threefold command to Peter: "Feed my lambs. . . . Tend my sheep. . . . Feed my sheep" (John 21:15–17). The word translated as "tend" (poimaine) means "to direct" or "to superintend"—in other words, "to govern." So although there are sheep that are not of Christ’s fold, it is through the Church that they are able to receive his salvation.

People who have never had an opportunity to hear of Christ and his Church—and those Christians whose minds have been closed to the truth of the Church by their conditioning—are not necessarily cut off from God’s mercy. Vatican II phrases the doctrine in these terms: Those who, through no fault of their own, do not know the gospel of Christ or his Church, but who nevertheless seek God with a sincere heart, and moved by grace, try in their actions to do his will as they know it through the dictates of their consciences—those too may achieve eternal salvation (LG 16).

Since Christ died for all, and since all men are in fact called to one and the same destiny, which is divine, we must hold that the Holy Spirit offers to all the possibility of being made partakers, in a way known to God, of the Paschal mystery (Gaudium et Spes 22).

The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches:

Every man who is ignorant of the gospel of Christ and of his Church but seeks the truth and does the will of God in accordance with his understanding of it can be saved. It may be supposed that such persons would have desired baptism explicitly if they had known its necessity (CCC 1260).

Obviously, it is not their ignorance that enables them to be saved. Ignorance excuses only lack of knowledge. That which opens the salvation of Christ to them is their conscious effort, under grace, to serve God as well as they can on the basis of the best information they have about him.

The Church speaks of "implicit desire" or "longing" that can exist in the hearts of those who seek God but are ignorant of the means of his grace. If a person longs for salvation but does not know the divinely established means of salvation, he is said to have an implicit desire for membership in the Church. Non-Catholic Christians know Christ, but they do not know his Church. In their desire to serve him, they implicitly desire to be members of his Church. Non-Christians can be saved, said John Paul, if they seek God with "a sincere heart." In that seeking they are "related" to Christ and to his body the Church (address to the CDF).

On the other hand, the Church has long made it clear that if a person rejects the Church with full knowledge and consent, he puts his soul in danger:

They cannot be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or remain in it (cf. LG 14).

The Catholic Church is "the single and exclusive channel by which the truth and grace of Christ enter our world of space and time" (Karl Adam, The Spirit of Catholicism, 179). Those who do not know the Church, even those who fight against it, can receive these gifts if they honestly seek God and his truth. But, Adam says, "though it be not the Catholic Church itself that hands them the bread of truth and grace, yet it is Catholic bread that they eat." And when they eat of it, "without knowing it or willing it" they are "incorporated in the supernatural substance of the Church."

Extra ecclesiam, nulla salus.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR



Fr. Ray Ryland, a convert and former Episcopal priest, holds a Ph.D. in theology from Marquette University and is a contributing editor to This Rock. He writes from Steubenville, Ohio, where he lives with his wife, Ruth.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Ecumenism; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; church; cult; pope; salvation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,581-2,6002,601-2,6202,621-2,640 ... 2,801-2,817 next last
To: kosta50

“So what?”

“for this man is to Me a vessel of election, to carry My name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel.”


2,601 posted on 07/14/2009 8:13:40 PM PDT by Semper Mark (Third World trickle up poverty, will lead to cascading Third World tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2600 | View Replies]

To: Markos33
“for this man is to Me a vessel of election, to carry My name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel.”

But how do you KNOW that this is true?

2,602 posted on 07/14/2009 10:48:30 PM PDT by kosta50 (Don't look up, the truth is all around you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2601 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

Bye Troll. Go play judge over someone elses life.


2,603 posted on 07/14/2009 11:31:39 PM PDT by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgement? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2575 | View Replies]

To: boatbums
How easy to defend when you don't know the first thing about the circumstances. My MOTHER was the Catholic. They were married by a CATHOLIC priest. Father initiated divorce, step-mother also got divorced. My mom was the one who was not contacted about the annulment quest even though we all knew where she was living. Priest contacted for the annulment didn't bother to try to contact her. She has never remarried. Care to rethink your knee-jerk response!

Oh my! Was that supposed to be your "Matlock moment?"

I'm not here to justify what may or may not be irregularities with your father's annulment, but did you ever ask him what the grounds for granting the annulment were?

Even so, believe it or not, parents are not always candid with their children. My own mother sang the song of abandonment through my entire childhood. It was only when I asked my father that I learned his reasoning *and* the fact he left knowing full well he'd be sent to Viet Nam if he did.

2,604 posted on 07/15/2009 3:31:21 AM PDT by papertyger (A difference that makes no difference is no difference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2587 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

If it walks like a duck...


2,605 posted on 07/15/2009 3:34:26 AM PDT by papertyger (A difference that makes no difference is no difference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2603 | View Replies]

To: kosta50
Impressive. In other words, because Paul says so in the Bible? And how do you know what's in the Bible is true? Wait, let me guess—because Paul says so, right? And how do you know what Paul says is true? Wait, I get it—because it's in the Bible! Right!?

The only "start" I see from your array of verses here is a beginning of circular reasoning...

Some guys named Matthew, Mark and John claim they wrote down what Jesus had to say...Why is it you believe them but not Paul???

Why do you quote/post bible verses if you don't think or are not convinced they are true???

Is that the position of your church as well??? They figure Paul maybe made a lot of stuff up??? Or maybe Paul never even existed???

Maybe there is no adoption of Gentiles into the church....Why do you even call yourselves Christians when you don't even believe the Christian Bible???

How do you know Jesus really said, 'Eat my flesh'??? You go thru that ritual just in case???

You ask for evidence...I give it to you and you say how do I know the bible is true...

Well what makes you a Christian???

You use Paul's statement that the church is the pillar and ground of the truth...And now you say you don't even know if Paul really ever said that...How can you even be sure there's a God???

2,606 posted on 07/15/2009 5:10:56 AM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2596 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
Our Roman Catholic brethren can't believe their lying eyes!

Luke 16: 19"There was a rich man who was dressed in purple and fine linen and lived in luxury every day. 20At his gate was laid a beggar named Lazarus, covered with sores 21and longing to eat what fell from the rich man's table. Even the dogs came and licked his sores.

22"The time came when the beggar died and the angels carried him to Abraham's side. The rich man also died and was buried. 23In hell,[c] where he was in torment, he looked up and saw Abraham far away, with Lazarus by his side. 24So he called to him, 'Father Abraham, have pity on me and send Lazarus to dip the tip of his finger in water and cool my tongue, because I am in agony in this fire.'

25"But Abraham replied, 'Son, remember that in your lifetime you received your good things, while Lazarus received bad things, but now he is comforted here and you are in agony. 26And besides all this, between us and you a great chasm has been fixed, so that those who want to go from here to you cannot, nor can anyone cross over from there to us.'

27"He answered, 'Then I beg you, father, send Lazarus to my father's house, 28for I have five brothers. Let him warn them, so that they will not also come to this place of torment.'

29"Abraham replied, 'They have Moses and the Prophets; let them listen to them.'

30" 'No, father Abraham,' he said, 'but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.'

31"He said to him, 'If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead.' " ...

...

Luke 20: 1 ... Then Jesus said to them, "How is it that they say the Christ is the Son of David? 42David himself declares in the Book of Psalms:
" 'The Lord said to my Lord:
"Sit at my right hand
43until I make your enemies
a footstool for your feet." ' 44David calls him 'Lord.' How then can he be his son?"

45While all the people were listening, Jesus said to his disciples, 46"Beware of the teachers of the law. They like to walk around in flowing robes and love to be greeted in the marketplaces and have the most important seats in the synagogues and the places of honor at banquets. 47They devour widows' houses and for a show make lengthy prayers. Such men will be punished most severely." ...

...

Romans 8: 9 You, however, are controlled not by the sinful nature but by the Spirit, if the Spirit of God lives in you. And if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong to Christ. 10 But if Christ is in you, your body is dead because of sin, yet your spirit is alive because of righteousness. 11 And if the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead is living in you, he who raised Christ from the dead will also give life to your mortal bodies through his Spirit, who lives in you. -

-with love, Jesus and Paul


2,607 posted on 07/15/2009 5:36:06 AM PDT by WVKayaker (Even stumbling blocks can be used for re-construction - Ernst R. Hauschka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2606 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker

Interesting picture...Why do you figure 2 men are holding the pope’s clothes, while he’s wearing them...They each have a hand over their hearts...

Looks to be a ‘Royal’ performance for the onlookers...

Knowing what we know about Peter, can you imagine Peter dressing up in a get-up like that???


2,608 posted on 07/15/2009 5:59:30 AM PDT by Iscool (I don't understand all that I know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2607 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
In a prior post, I quoted Jesus talking about calling any man "father". Yet, the latin word for their political leader means exactly that.

They can't see the forest for the trees. In this case, the trees wear robes and tell people how to act and what to believe, upon penalty of "excommunication"

I am so glad that we have a merciful God, a true Father. I am so grateful we have His human life, suffering, and death as a substitution for us, though we are the ones found GUILTY. I thank Him daily thaat through His resurrection, God empowers us with His Holy Spirit. Without the indwelling Sprit, we are indeed lost.

The Roman Catholics have repeatedly thanked me for posting these pictures showing the wealth of their organization, and laud the the Pope, the leader of their society. Jesus was very clear on those types, as I posted.

But, God, in His wisdom gave us this Spirit for a reason. Like Paul, we are to seek His will for our lives. Will we be able to do all that He requires. NO! But, His promises don't depend on us, or membership in good standing, of ANY so-called organized church. WE are the church, and ONLY in Him, will we have power...

Romans 8: 12 Therefore, brothers, we have an obligation—but it is not to the sinful nature, to live according to it. 13 For if you live according to the sinful nature, you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the misdeeds of the body, you will live, 14 because those who are led by the Spirit of God are sons of God. 15 For you did not receive a spirit that makes you a slave again to fear, but you received the Spirit of sonship. And by him we cry, "Abba Father." 16 The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit that we are God's children. 17 Now if we are children, then we are heirs—heirs of God and co-heirs with Christ, if indeed we share in his sufferings in order that we may also share in his glory. ...

37 ... No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. 38 For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, 39 neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.


2,609 posted on 07/15/2009 6:22:25 AM PDT by WVKayaker (Even stumbling blocks can be used for re-construction - Ernst R. Hauschka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2608 | View Replies]

To: PugetSoundSoldier

The Church is one way that Christ may be revealed to pre-Christians but it is NOT the only way.

I agree ,much of Church doctrine is man made and not God made.


2,610 posted on 07/15/2009 6:25:03 AM PDT by sonic109
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker

Judas always complains about the money.


2,611 posted on 07/15/2009 7:36:07 AM PDT by papertyger (A difference that makes no difference is no difference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2607 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
Knowing what we know about Peter, can you imagine Peter dressing up in a get-up like that???

Absolutely!

2,612 posted on 07/15/2009 7:40:00 AM PDT by papertyger (A difference that makes no difference is no difference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2608 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker
They can't see the forest for the trees.

And you can?

Tell you what, you pray for winning lottery numbers "in Jesus' name," then tell others what they can and cannot see.

God empowers us with His Holy Spirit.

To do what? Tell everyone how "saved" we are? You don't need God to do that. All you need is a big ego.

Now if you want to be set free from the law of sin and death after you get saved, you need to eat his flesh and drink his blood...at least in my experience.

But, God, in His wisdom gave us this Spirit for a reason.

Is that the spirit that leads you into all truth, but leads others into different all truths?

2,613 posted on 07/15/2009 8:07:59 AM PDT by papertyger (A difference that makes no difference is no difference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2609 | View Replies]

To: sonic109
The Church is one way that Christ may be revealed to pre-Christians but it is NOT the only way.

And you know that, how?

I agree ,much of Church doctrine is man made and not God made.

What do you expect when a man is given "the keys?"

That's how it's *supposed* to work. You think God drafts a memo or something?

Or is what you mean by "man made" really just that it doesn't meet your approval?

2,614 posted on 07/15/2009 8:14:55 AM PDT by papertyger (A difference that makes no difference is no difference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2610 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

The Holy Spirit reveals different, mutually-exclusive truths to different souls all the time, donchaknow.


2,615 posted on 07/15/2009 8:17:05 AM PDT by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2613 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Frankly, I’m always horrified by the idea of godly evangelicals tortured by their enslavement to sin, never realizing it’s because THEY AREN’T DOING WHAT HE TOLD THEM TO DO.


2,616 posted on 07/15/2009 8:42:27 AM PDT by papertyger (A difference that makes no difference is no difference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2615 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
Knowing what we know about Peter, can you imagine Peter dressing up in a get-up like that???

The Romans Catholics not only approve, they gloat about it. They love to display their wealth, and those that make note of it are called Judas. The Romann Catholics, led by their "priests", are the Pharisee's of today. My Priest is Jesus, and I am a joint heir with Him, by adoption.

Mark 6: Then Jesus went around teaching from village to village. 7 Calling the Twelve to him, he sent them out two by two and gave them authority over evil spirits.

8 These were his instructions: "Take nothing for the journey except a staff—no bread, no bag, no money in your belts. 9 Wear sandals but not an extra tunic. ...

They are therefore equating Jesus as a traitor, as was Judas. Wealth is anathema to God. The Roman Catholic church hoards it, while the poor still lay by the gate. Paul assures us that Jesus is God... Hmmmm...

8 "The master commended the dishonest manager because he had acted shrewdly. For the people of this world are more shrewd in dealing with their own kind than are the people of the light. 9 I tell you, use worldly wealth to gain friends for yourselves, so that when it is gone, you will be welcomed into eternal dwellings.

10 "Whoever can be trusted with very little can also be trusted with much, and whoever is dishonest with very little will also be dishonest with much. 11 So if you have not been trustworthy in handling worldly wealth, who will trust you with true riches? 12 And if you have not been trustworthy with someone else's property, who will give you property of your own?

13 "No servant can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and Money."

14 The Pharisees, who loved money, heard all this and were sneering at Jesus. 15 He said to them, "You are the ones who justify yourselves in the eyes of men, but God knows your hearts. What is highly valued among men is detestable in God's sight. ...

...

Romans 3: 21 But now a righteousness from God, apart from law, has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify. 22 This righteousness from God comes through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference, 23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, 24 and are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus. 25 God presented him as a sacrifice of atonement,[i] through faith in his blood. He did this to demonstrate his justice, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished— 26 he did it to demonstrate his justice at the present time, so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus.

27 Where, then, is boasting? It is excluded...

Peter's alleged progeny needs a little more, I guess! Bulletproof glass and lots of security guys... just like Jesus said, NOT!

2,617 posted on 07/15/2009 9:04:56 AM PDT by WVKayaker (Even stumbling blocks can be used for re-construction - Ernst R. Hauschka)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2608 | View Replies]

To: Iscool
Some guys named Matthew, Mark and John claim they wrote down what Jesus had to say

They never claimed that. The oldest fragments of the Gospels are anonymous. It was almost two centuries later that the Church added "According to [kata].... (adding the name of the Apostle who supposedly wrote each book).

...Why is it you believe them but not Paul???

I am not the one who is making any claims as regards the authenticity of their writings. But there is a huge difference between the Gospels and Pauline epistles. For one, Paul is the judge and the jury. No witnesses to corroborate his claims. At least the Gospels have some degree of internal agreement.

I would imagine that, assuming the Gospels are records of eyewitnesses (and that can be debated), they represent God in person, and not "experienced" in some internal inspiration. It's one thing to say "Jesus said before all..." and another to say "I saw a vision..."

Why do you quote/post bible verses if you don't think or are not convinced they are true???

I don't quote the Bible to prove the verses are true. I quote them because they are in context of the discussion. Besides, that's the only language some recognize, so what else will I quote to them?

Is that the position of your church as well??? They figure Paul maybe made a lot of stuff up??? Or maybe Paul never even existed???

I don't speak for any church or the Church. I just ask how do you know that what Paul says is "God-inspired."

Maybe there is no adoption of Gentiles into the church....Why do you even call yourselves Christians when you don't even believe the Christian Bible???

You are not answering my question, Iscool. Instead you are asking me questions! I simply asked how do you know that what Paul said is inspired, and you gave me a bunch of verses, and then I asked you how do you know what the verses say is true, and your response is asking me questions! I made no definitive statements as regards Paul or the Bible.

I simply asked how do you know what you claim as fact. So, if you don't mind, let's try to stay on track.

How do you know Jesus really said, 'Eat my flesh'??? You go thru that ritual just in case???

I don't. That's why I asked you because you seem to claim you do.

You ask for evidence...I give it to you and you say how do I know the bible is true...

Wouldn't you ask for evidence if someone said "I saw pink unicorns on Jupiter?" And you didn't give me evidence, you gave me the Bible! So, I asked you, okay, how do you know what the Bible says is true...and you find that strange? If you say "this is good for you" and I ask you how do you know it is, and instead of an answer you ask me "and how do you know it isn't?"! That's just plain wrong, but it's telling me that you really don't know...

You think it's strange to ask how does one know what he claims to know? I find that strange!

Well what makes you a Christian???

I didn't say I am. What makes you a Christian? It can't be knowledge because so far you gave me nothing to indicate how do you KNOW these things. Again, I made no statements, just asked questions. Instead of telling me how do you know you are asking me questions!

You use Paul's statement that the church is the pillar and ground of the truth...And now you say you don't even know if Paul really ever said that...

I said that? Where? As far as I know, at least seven of Paul's thirteen Epistles are written by someone who calls himself Paul. I don't dispute that. But I don't see why I should consider what he wrote to be God-breathed. You seem to think it is, so I asked you how do you know and you give me the Bible! So, then, how do you know the Bible is God-inspired? because Paul said so, right? Wrong.

Circular reasoning is no proof, Iscool. You can't say Paul is inspired because the Bible says so, and then say the Bible is true because it is the word of God because Paul is speaking God's words, which are in the Bible...

How can you even be sure there's a God???

Obviously I am not the one making definitive statements. But you do. So, asking me questions is silly because if I knew, as you claim you do, why would I be asking you questions!?! So tell me , how do you know that God does exist, and how do you know what you claim to know is really God?

2,618 posted on 07/15/2009 9:31:46 AM PDT by kosta50 (Don't look up, the truth is all around you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2606 | View Replies]

To: papertyger
Last word to try to get you to understand. If you can't understand this then no one can reach you. I'm very certain your Priest understands this passage abd could explain it to you.

Luke ch 18 9Then Jesus told this story to some who had great self-confidence and scorned everyone else: 10“Two men went to the Temple to pray. One was a Pharisee, and the other was a dishonest tax collector. 11The proud Pharisee stood by himself and prayed this prayer: ‘I thank you, God, that I am not a sinner like everyone else, especially like that tax collector over there! For I never cheat, I don’t sin, I don’t commit adultery, 12I fast twice a week, and I give you a tenth of my income.’ 13“But the tax collector stood at a distance and dared not even lift his eyes to heaven as he prayed. Instead, he beat his chest in sorrow, saying, ‘O God, be merciful to me, for I am a sinner.’ 14I tell you, this sinner, not the Pharisee, returned home justified before God. For the proud will be humbled, but the humble will be honored.”

2,619 posted on 07/15/2009 10:16:17 AM PDT by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgement? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2605 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker
These were his instructions: "Take nothing for the journey except a staff—no bread, no bag, no money in your belts. 9 Wear sandals but not an extra tunic. ...

He also told them to go only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel on that trip.

Are you new at this?

2,620 posted on 07/15/2009 10:49:40 AM PDT by papertyger (A difference that makes no difference is no difference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2617 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,581-2,6002,601-2,6202,621-2,640 ... 2,801-2,817 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson