Replies

Reasons for Changing the Original Bible (Ecumenical)
________________________________________________

As I am a “Bible only” believer, this (Ecumenical) thread must be intended for me, and my “sort”...

However, what attracted me to the thread was the many deleted posts ...

Were they all by Bible believing Christians who were offended by the content of the article ???

Was this thread posted as information...

of as a bone-of-contention ???

As in “antaganistic” ???

The REAL Bible, both the Old Testament, which contains beliefs of my Jewish ancestors, and attests to the coming Messiah, Yeshua...

and the New Testament, which contains the ONLY testament to the fact that the Messiah, the Word, Jesus, the only begotten Son of God, the Lamb of God, did come, and shed His precious blood and died on the cross for me, in my place, and took the penalty of death for my sins on Him, my advocate with God the Father...

My French Huguenot ancestors thought that the words contained in the Bible, both the Old Testament and the New Testament, so life or death important, that they preserved them for their children by baking their Bible into a loaf of bread before they fled France for England, and the US...

With an example like that, how could I take The Bible lightly ???

And not also defend the life giving utterances of Jesus and the Prophets (the REAL prophets)...

I am the Way, the truth and the Life. No man (or woman) comes to the Father, except by Me.. John 14:6

For God so loved (Nana and) the world that he gave His only begotten son, that (if Nana or) whosoever believes in him, should not perish, but have everlasting LIFE. John 3:16