Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Quix's Commentary On Pope Paul VI's 1967 Populorum Progressio RE: Globalism Implications
Quix's mysterious thought processes and the Vatican URL link given ^ | 26 MARCH 1967 AND 23 MAY 2009 | Pope Paul VI & Quix

Posted on 05/23/2009 9:10:25 PM PDT by Quix

Quix’s commentary on Pope Paul VI-th’s:

POPULORUM PROGRESSIO

ENCYCLICAL OF POPE PAUL VI
ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF PEOPLES

MARCH 26, 1967

FROM:

http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/paul_vi/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-vi_enc_26031967_populorum_en.html

paragraph 13:

. . . But since the Church does dwell among men, she has the duty "of scrutinizing the signs of the times and of interpreting them in the light of the Gospel." (14) Sharing the noblest aspirations of men and suffering when she sees these aspirations not satisfied, she wishes to help them attain their full realization. So she offers man her distinctive contribution: a global perspective on man and human realities.

.

Qx:
A couple of things stand out to me in this paragraph. “. . . signs of the times.” That’s a rather Pentecostal phrase! LOL. I wonder what his thinking was as he chose that phrase. Or does it mean something different in Latin than it does to Pentecostals in English?

In English, to Pentecostals it equals “END TIMES” and the Biblical signs thereof. I’d think, HOPE, that the Vatican translators would KNOW that. If they didn’t and it slipped through, then their scholarship is not very impressive.

This term: “. . . a global perspective on man and human realities” is a bit fascinating . . . Certainly the Pope would have reason to consider his turf of global reach—quite reasonably, plausibly.

However, it also certainly fits globalism’s goals, wording and purview, as well. Whether this was deliberately done or not, the globalist puppet masters had to be pleased with that wording.

A New Humanism Needed

20. If development calls for an ever-growing number of technical experts, even more necessary still is the deep thought and reflection of wise men in search of a new humanism, one which will enable our contemporaries to enjoy the higher values of love and friendship, of prayer and contemplation, (17) and thus find themselves. This is what will guarantee man's authentic development—his transition from less than human conditions to truly human ones.

.

Hmmmmm “. . . a new humanism, . . .” Doesn’t sound that different than the Georgia Guidestones—the globalist’s ‘Ten Commandments.’

http://www.radioliberty.com/stones.htm

I’m not really that thrilled with the term “humanism.” Why would a Pope ‘need’ to use it. Humanism is NOT the objective of Believers in Christ. If anything, it should be “God-ism.” We are being conformed to HIS LIKENESS—if we are truly His Children.

“Humanism” is a satanic term in virtually all its modern uses. It is a seductive deception from hell. It pleases the flesh and flatters pride. It exalts man above or at least equal to God. I’m saddened to see the Pope use it.

The Use of Private Property

23. "He who has the goods of this world and sees his brother in need and closes his heart to him, how does the love of God abide in him?" (21) Everyone knows that the Fathers of the Church laid down the duty of the rich toward the poor in no uncertain terms. As St. Ambrose put it: "You are not making a gift of what is yours to the poor man, but you are giving him back what is his. You have been appropriating things that are meant to be for the common use of everyone. The earth belongs to everyone, not to the rich." (22) These words indicate that the right to private property is not absolute and unconditional.

.

I’ve long pondered this issue. Biblically, in terms of Christian thought and practice, I mostly agree with the Pope. And, I believe that authentic Christians in most places in these END TIMES will end up sharing all things in common as they did 2000 years ago. And that those proudly, selfishly unwilling to do so will suddenly find themselves WITHOUT their goods and wealth AND HIGHLY LIKELY, without--outside the camp of God’s people.

HOWEVER, we can observe in the story of Peter and Ananias and Sapphira, that there was NO COMPULSION FROM the Disciples. It was VOLUNTARY.

I don’t see IN SCRIPTURE, per se, the “You are not making a gift of what is yours to the poor man, but you are giving him back what is his.”

Scripture indicates that—essentially—IN GENERAL—that Godly people are blessed of God. That can end up creating a false ‘vending machine’ mentality about God. However, the Promises of God are clear in Scripture and include being blessed materially for those who walk close to God. King David and Solomon are but two examples. Kenneth Hagin was Biblical in his teachings and practices on that score. Most of his ‘disciples’ have jumped off the cliff with it but he was not that far off, himself.

Yet, God does also seem to call some individuals to a life of material poverty and spiritual wealth. And, many believers would bankrupt their souls if God blessed them materially—idolizing things.

In fact, SCRIPTURE IS CLEAR that whether by the work of one’s hands or as manna from Heaven—ALL BLESSINGS COME FROM GOD. The rich man AND the poor man who construes it otherwise are both on thin ice, from God’s perspective.

And, I CERTAINLY BELIEVE that IF Christians had applied the—‘if you have two, give your brother one’ Biblical principle, the horrendous welfare system would never have gotten off the ground short of a globalist forced strong-armed thing. CHRISTIANS TOO have been far too materialistic in every Christian group and flavor. And the Church Universal and individual Believers have suffered great loss because of that.

Yet, it is NOT the stuff that’s evil—but the LOVE of the stuff that is damning idolatry.

No one may appropriate surplus goods solely for his own private use when others lack the bare necessities of life. In short, "as the Fathers of the Church and other eminent theologians tell us, the right of private property may never be exercised to the detriment of the common good." When "private gain and basic community needs conflict with one another," it is for the public authorities "to seek a solution to these questions, with the active involvement of individual citizens and social groups." (23)

.

This begins to feel, again, like globalist tyrannical group-think, forced, coerced ‘charity’ a la the looming globalist Gestapo--forced conformity etc. As Shrillery said, WE ARE GOING TO TAKE THINGS FROM YOU, FOR THE COMMON GOOD.

SCRIPTURE is quite different—GOD LOVES A CHEERFUL GIVER—NOT out of compulsion, social pressure [perhaps we could say—nor out of law]—but freely AS UNTO GOD. 2 Cor 9:7

.

The Common Good

24. If certain landed estates impede the general prosperity because they are extensive, unused or poorly used, or because they bring hardship to peoples or are detrimental to the interests of the country, the common good sometimes demands their expropriation.

.

Hmmmmm . . . that phrase again “The Common Good.” “LIBERATION THEOLOGY” . . . that ended up deepening the enslavement of the serfs—quite along globalist lines and agenda. “. . . demands their expropriation.” Perhaps morally. To do it as government fiat is tyranny.

Vatican II affirms this emphatically. (24) At the same time it clearly teaches that income thus derived is not for man's capricious use, and that the exclusive pursuit of personal gain is prohibited. Consequently, it is not permissible for citizens who have garnered sizeable income from the resources and activities of their own nation to deposit a large portion of their income in foreign countries for the sake of their own private gain alone, taking no account of their country's interests; in doing this, they clearly wrong their country. (25)

.

True enough. They do wrong their own country. And likely they wrong their own souls. However, freedom at some point and for quite a distance, still requires that they be accountable to God and His Body of Believers vs to government tyrannical fiat—imho. And, I think the Believers as a group in every group have let evil hearted fat cats get off with horrific stuff because we were respecters of persons in violation of scripture. This is evident in the RC delivery of The Lord’s Supper to the likes of Scuba Teddy et al.

Unbridled Liberalism

26. However, certain concepts have somehow arisen out of these new conditions and insinuated themselves into the fabric of human society. These concepts present profit as the chief spur to economic progress, free competition as the guiding norm of economics, and private ownership of the means of production as an absolute right, having no limits nor concomitant social obligations.

.

While I might technically agree with him from a Biblical perspective . . . the limits must arise out of each individual’s relationship with God and NOT be a result of government fiat inserting itself between the individual and God.

Yet, the Pope seems to be setting up a kind of foundation for LIBERATION THEOLOGY GLOBALIST mandate for confiscating private property. That’s more than a little disturbing.

This unbridled liberalism paves the way for a particular type of tyranny, rightly condemned by Our predecessor Pius XI, for it results in the "international imperialism of money."(26)

.

This is indeed a paradox. Liberalism as currently practiced and, actually, as practiced for many decades . . . has been mostly about CONFISCATION of private property for WASTEFUL government bureaucracy and globalist tyranny types of programs.

And, it is the globalists and their tyrannical world government that will be the ultimate most intense imperialism—with a very deified materialism morphing into satan worship. It is more than a little odd that the Pope comes off speaking such memes, such phrasing, such themes.

Such improper manipulations of economic forces can never be condemned enough; let it be said once again that economics is supposed to be in the service of man. (27)

.

That’s a lofty ideal. Though I can’t think of a Scripture, per se, that espouses it. “. . . can never be condemned enough ;” sounds like Communistic tyranny, to me.

I don’t recall a single Scripture condemning riches, per se. Riches can easily keep a rich man out of Heaven. A rich man who shuts up his heart to the needs of the poor is in trouble with God. However, we are talking about heart attitudes first and foremost and deeds secondarily. The idolatry is the root issue.

However, Christians of all flavors have demonstrated far too much [any is too much] of such idolatry—shutting up their hearts against the poor . . . Being given far too much to selfishness. Ignoring God to work extra hours for a bigger TV screen, a flashier car, more expensive Nike’s etc.

Reform, Not Revolution

30. The injustice of certain situations cries out for God's attention. Lacking the bare necessities of life, whole nations are under the thumb of others; they cannot act on their own initiative; they cannot exercise personal responsibility; they cannot work toward a higher degree of cultural refinement or a greater participation in social and public life. They are sorely tempted to redress these insults to their human nature by violent means.

.

QUITE SO. However, most such situations have been and are set up by the globalists over the last century plus. Siding with their priorities, motivations, goals will only worsen such things. The globalists are collecting to themselves MORE of the world’s wealth at the expense of the poor and are determined to not just leave folks poor—but to exterminate them--massively.

31. Everyone knows, however, that revolutionary uprisings—except where there is manifest, longstanding tyranny which would do great damage to fundamental personal rights and dangerous harm to the common good of the country—engender new injustices, introduce new inequities and bring new disasters. The evil situation that exists, and it surely is evil, may not be dealt with in such a way that an even worse situation results.

.

Thankfully, he does see the truth of that! Praise God for that!

Programs and Planning

33. Individual initiative alone and the interplay of competition will not ensure satisfactory development. We cannot proceed to increase the wealth and power of the rich while we entrench the needy in their poverty and add to the woes of the oppressed. Organized programs are necessary for "directing, stimulating, coordinating, supplying and integrating" (35) the work of individuals and intermediary organizations.

.

Sounds like Shrillery, Biden, Puhlousey, Scuba Teddy and OThuga again. Bring Heaven to earth by government fiat. Won’t happen. Would NEVER succeed. Heart change is required else all other systems and means descend into hell. And ONLY Christ engineers heart changes.

It is for the public authorities to establish and lay down the desired goals, the plans to be followed, and the methods to be used in fulfilling them; and it is also their task to stimulate the efforts of those involved in this common activity. But they must also see to it that private initiative and intermediary organizations are involved in this work. In this way they will avoid total collectivization and the dangers of a planned economy which might threaten human liberty and obstruct the exercise of man's basic human rights.

.

Is this a milk-sop in behalf of “private initiative?” Sounds rather weak along-side the other assertions.

Basic Education

35. We can even say that economic growth is dependent on social progress, the goal to which it aspires; and that basic education is the first objective for any nation seeking to develop itself. Lack of education is as serious as lack of food; the illiterate is a starved spirit. When someone learns how to read and write, he is equipped to do a job and to shoulder a profession, to develop selfconfidence and realize that he can progress along with others. As We said in Our message to the UNESCO meeting at Teheran, literacy is the "first and most basic tool for personal enrichment and social integration; and it is society's most valuable tool for furthering development and economic progress." (36)

.

Sounds lofty. HOWEVER, UNESCO is a globalist organization that has been tirelessly seducing the world in behalf of globalism and globalist goals for many decades.

AND, EDUCATION was designed more than 100 years ago as a primary way of destroying the family and delivering the new Gestapo to the globalist masters untainted by God, religion and parental influences. Certainly I’m for education—God fearing education. I assume the Pope was, too. Yet, why this praise, seemingly, for UNESCO. Was he that ignorant of UNESCO’S aims? I doubt that.

We also rejoice at the good work accomplished in this field by private initiative, by the public authorities, and by international organizations. These are the primary agents of development, because they enable man to act for himself.

.

Thankfully, he included “private initiative.” HOWEVER, he seemed to give the lion’s share of support for ‘public authorities and INTERNATIONAL organizations.’ International organizations have been main tools of globalism for many decades. The Pope MUST have known that. If he was too ignorant to know that, then the Vatican information gathering and analyzing apparatus was still in kindergarten or chronically drunk on their rears.

IF he knew that—as he should have—and still ended up supporting INTERNATIOINAL ORGS, more or less carte blanche--then he’s complicit in globalism plain and simple.

Population Growth

37. There is no denying that the accelerated rate of population growth brings many added difficulties to the problems of development where the size of the population grows more rapidly than the quantity of available resources to such a degree that things seem to have reached an impasse. In such circumstances people are inclined to apply drastic remedies to reduce the birth rate.

There is no doubt that public authorities can intervene in this matter, within the bounds of their competence. They can instruct citizens on this subject and adopt appropriate measures, so long as these are in conformity with the dictates of the moral law and the rightful freedom of married couples is preserved completely intact. When the inalienable right of marriage and of procreation is taken away, so is human dignity.

Finally, it is for parents to take a thorough look at the matter and decide upon the number of their children. This is an obligation they take upon themselves, before their children already born, and before the community to which they belong—following the dictates of their own consciences informed by God's law authentically interpreted, and bolstered by their trust in Him. (39)

.

This whole section is MOST CURIOUS. He seems—SEEMS to tread a thin line here. He doesn’t actually violate RC dogma—but he sure seems to come close. He sure seems to walk as close as possible to globalist constructions on population and to globalist goals, aims and methods. Disturbing.

A Full-Bodied Humanism

42. The ultimate goal is a fullbodied humanism. (44) And does this not mean the fulfillment of the whole man and of every man? A narrow humanism, closed in on itself and not open to the values of the spirit and to God who is their source, could achieve apparent success, for man can set about organizing terrestrial realities without God. But "closed off from God, they will end up being directed against man. A humanism closed off from other realities becomes inhuman." (45)

.

I was glad to see this paragraph. However, along-side all the others, it comes across as a bit of a weak milk-sop.

True humanism points the way toward God and acknowledges the task to which we are called, the task which offers us the real meaning of human life. Man is not the ultimate measure of man. Man becomes truly man only by passing beyond himself. In the words of Pascal: "Man infinitely surpasses man." (46)

.

This, comes across to me as an upside-down way of putting it. GOD in Christ-redeemed RELATIONSHIP WITH MAN results in individuals becoming TRULY HUMAN as God designed them to be. Humanism—even “True Humanism” doesn’t point to God, imho. Humanism as a term, as a concept is still tainted—to me--with its origins in hell.

Three Major Duties

44. This duty concerns first and foremost the wealthier nations. Their obligations stem from the human and supernatural brotherhood of man, and present a three-fold obligation: 1) mutual solidarity—the aid that the richer nations must give to developing nations; 2) social justice—the rectification of trade relations between strong and weak nations; 3) universal charity—the effort to build a more humane world community, where all can give and receive, and where the progress of some is not bought at the expense of others. The matter is urgent, for on it depends the future of world civilization.

.

This sounds quite lofty. However, it’s almost straight globalist dogma. It’s full of globalist euphemisms—beginning with ‘the brotherhood of man.” “ . . . to build a more humane world community.”

Who could be against that? Any thinking person aware of THE MEANS and the eventual structure of the purported ‘HUMANE” WORLD community. There’s that emphasis on HUMANISM and WORLD again. Disturbing.

Aid to Developing Nations

45. "If a brother or a sister be naked and in want of daily food," says St. James, "and one of you say to them, 'Go in peace, be warm and filled,' yet you do not give them what is necessary for the body, what does it profit?" (48) Today no one can be unaware of the fact that on some continents countless men and women are ravished by hunger and countless children are undernourished. Many children die at an early age; many more of them find their physical and mental growth retarded. Thus whole populations are immersed in pitiable circumstances and lose heart.

.

Quite so. And, it IS the Body of Christ’s duty and privilege to help rectify such situations, conditions etc. And we have failed far too much at that task.

HOWEVER, WE HAVE ALSO SUCCEEDED at correcting such, FAR MORE THAN globalist government efforts have.

Joya is still working on getting me the 2nd half. So I’m going to go ahead and post this much. I’ll add the 2nd half later or tomorrow, Lord willing and the Creek Indians don’t rise up.

Joya’s impression of the last half is that it’s much MORE full of globalism than this half. God have mercy.

Satan’s seductions have been very skillful and comprehensive for millennia. And, he no doubt targeted the Vatican from early on. . . . as he has and does any even possibly authentic expression of Christianity. Sigh.


TOPICS: Current Events; General Discusssion; History; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: endtimes; globalism; tyranny; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-188 next last
To: D-fendr; Alamo-Girl; airborne; AngieGal; annieokie; aragorn; auggy; backhoe; bearsgirl90; ...

Regardless of what the willfully blind and the chronically clueless think of

me as a person;
me as a Christian;
me as an interpreter of The Bible;
me as an observer and interpreter of the END TIMES;
me as a sane/insane individual;
me as a loving and kind individual;
me as a fair-minded observer of Roman Catholicism;

by God’s Grace, my duties as a watchman on the wall have been executed more or less to the best of my abilities on this thread. I stand clean and clear before my Lord in the matter. His judgments on such scores are the only ones that count eternally.


101 posted on 05/26/2009 4:18:56 AM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Quix; Mad Dawg
At least he clearly understands the issues and is prepared theologically, philosophically . . . & teologically?

And how does one prepare to answer your post about a man who claims "space people from Mars and Venus" follow him around and who claims he gave a sealed package from space people to a dying pope? Facts and reason and sanity? These do not apply, and are promptly replaced by more fanciful dreams - as we see on this thread.

me as a fair-minded observer of Roman Catholicism

No, that thought doesn't occur to me. But Catholicism is not special in this regard. The whole universe is honeycombed with space men and globalist, no universalist, conspiracies and bizarre secrets in your worldview. I'm sure you're a really fine person - when not irresponsibly going Dan Brown on your listener's church. Since that's not the case here, I don't feel the obligation to be overly courteous and warm and fuzzy in reply.

Most RC responses are some variation of MY DADDY IS !!!!TOO!!!! BIGGER THAN YOUR DADDY

Not mine. Mine is more like: "This is just one flailing nutso factoid after another."

I do agree, however, that Mad Dawg's patience and efforts are commendable even though doomed.

102 posted on 05/26/2009 4:58:55 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr; Mad Dawg
I do agree, however, that Mad Dawg's patience and efforts are commendable even though doomed.

Very good analysis

103 posted on 05/26/2009 5:13:19 AM PDT by stfassisi ((The greatest gift God gives us is that of overcoming self"-St Francis Assisi)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg; Alamo-Girl; betty boop; DarthVader; Blogger; P-Marlowe; wmfights; TaraP; Marysecretary

I used to observe, Mad Dawg,

that the diversity of opinions about matters theological, spiritual and geo-political were quite widely so—quite diverse over a broad range . . . in almost any group—regardless of how homogeneous.

Increasingly in recent years and certainly months . . . it has appeared to be the case that the perspectives are distilling out into essentially

TWO PERSPECTIVES . . .

one might label these two perspectives . . . variations on two themes . . .

the perspectives of The SHEEP OF THE LORD JESUS CHRIST

VS

the perspectives of The GOATS.

This could be a merely interesting phenomenon of this END TIMES era. Alas, it has eternal life implications.

Folks seem oblivious to the fact that more than ever in history . . . incremental tiny decisions are emphatically deciding where one will spend eternity—with—or withOUT

GOD.

The parable of the 10 Virgins is frightfully telling.

They were ALL Virgins. Essentially, they all had a “right” to the wedding feast—a bona fide invitation.

They weren’t currs, rebels, criminals, evil doers, per se.

And, they were ALL SOMEWHAT READY.

However, 5 were full up with oil and had extra oil. They were VERY PREPARED.

5 were not.

5 were shut-out—outside the door—where there was wailing and gnashing of teeth.

Frightful.

I have also observed over the years the significant degree to which The Lord—can’t put it any more accurately—THE LORD HAS USED my bird of rare plumage person—HIS CREATION, TRAINING, CONDITIONING—as a very interesting Rorschach.

I resisted admitting it for a very long time. He just kept nudging me every once in a while to notice that those who responded this way tended toward xyz sorts of life experiences, results, destinations . . . and those who responded that way, tended toward wvutx sorts of life experiences, results, destinations, consequences.

For a lot of years, that was merely kind of interesting. A sort of . . . side-line set of insights . . . a kind of curiosity.

In recent years and particularly months . . . the divide seems to have gotten much more stark, much wider much more quickly.

Oh, there are still a lot of people who seem to mill around in some sort of fence sitting middle ground. However, that group seems to be increasingly much smaller percentage-wise.

It seems that now, when folks make little decisions, indulge in certain kinds of attitudes . . . the consequences are much more intense and much quicker.

It is like they step much more so on a much slicker and much steeper slippery slope.

HAVE YOU NOTICED THAT—ANY OF YOU? . . . IN YOUR EXTENDED NETWORK regarding spiritual eternal life issues?

One key factor seems to be HARD-HEARTEDNESS.

Another seems to be PRIDE.

Another related one seems to be BROKENNESS AND HUMILITY BEFORE THE LORD.

Another seems to be . . . more or less unfettered yet very discerning OPENNESS !!!!TO THE LORD!!!! That is, they don’t have THE LORD in their own personal nor organizational tidy little box. They are quick to cast aside UNBiblical stuff—yet they are open to The Lord doing whatever The Lord wants to do as long as it’s THE LORD.

The GOAT RESPONSES . . . and the responses of those increasingly rapidly MORPHING INTO GOATS . . . are quite the opposite and increasingly so . . . haughtily so.

That’s more than a little frightful. It’s been increasingly sad to see that a lot of my nice “Christian” colleagues are decidedly goats. And their goat horns are growing.

Christians in my network over the whole of my life have read Scripture and taught that there would come a time when The Lord would make a much clearer dividing line between the sheep and the goats. It’s clear, that HE HAS BEGUN to much more overtly do just that.

And the Scripture comes to mind . . . “But Lord, did we not cast out demons in your name . . . and He shall say—DEPART FROM ME. I !NEVER! KNEW YOU.” That’s one of the most sobering verses in the Bible.

I don’t know specifically ‘therefore what.’

I just know that this is a growing phenomenon and a frightful one. I care a lot for these people. Yet, it is increasingly clear . . . that the longer they are on the slippery slope and the further down that slippery slope they are—the more unalterably, inexorably they are sliding into hell, literally.

And, sometimes, it seems as though some of the fiercely decisive little foxes that spoil the grapes decisions and actions . . . are towards other people—particularly “insignificant” people in their lives—the nobodies—or those they have marginalized for some reason, in some way. Their attitudes toward THOSE PEOPLE seem to have very heavy-weight consequences for them spiritually.

It’s NOT just their overt attitude toward God that’s so decisive.

Another alarming feature that seems to be increasing in all this . . . is that more and more often, The Lord is making it clear that I’m not to waste my time on folks that are well beyond the point of no-return on the slippery slope. That’s very starkly frightful, to me. Such folks have not suddenly grown horns and fangs and a forked tail. They still seem more or less civil. Yet, The Lord has made it clear, don’t waste any more time on them. God have mercy.

No, I don’t have any personal criteria. And, No, I don’t decide on my own brilliance or personal discernment who is beyond the point of no return. And, mercifully, The Lord hasn’t made such an emphatic instruction to me all THAT frequently yet. It’s just been MORE frequent than ever before.

And, it may be that in some cases, it’s just that my opportunity or capacity to have any redemptive influence has passed and I’m to let the person go to whatever and whomever The Lord can do otherwise.

Yet, I know . . . in some cases, the person is utterly eternally lost though they are still wandering around seemingly normal. That’s very frightful to me. Extremely sad, to me. I’ve long been a believer in counseling and in a lot of contexts—as long as there’s life, there’s hope. Evidently there are increasing numbers of THE WALKING DEAD.

I think we have seen since the election . . . a frightful rise in folks vulnerable to joining OThuga’s youth Gestapo. That’s shocking and dreadful enough.

What I think many authentic Believers are still unprepared for . . . is how many of their closer friends and “Christian” “brothers and sisters” will also end up decidedly on the side of OThuga, his Gestapo, the satanic world government etc.

Scripture is quite clear . . . spouses, brothers and sisters, friends, parents, children . . . will turn their own into the authorities for execution.

Hello, group.

It’s time for the sleepwalking to wake up!

Lots of things are not as they seem.

“This train donh carry no gamblers . . . this train . . . “


104 posted on 05/26/2009 5:41:16 AM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Quix
All y'all:
Philip Neri
"He was all things to all men.... When he was called upon to be merry, he was so; if there was a demand upon his sympathy, he was equally ready.... In consequence of his being so accessible and willing to receive all comers, many went to him every day, and some continued for the space of thirty, nay, forty years, to visit him very often both morning and evening, so that his room went by the agreeable nickname of the "Home of Christian mirth." The tradition of this genial saint was very much alive two hundred years later, when the German poet Goethe was living in Rome. He heard so much of Neri that he studied the sources and wrote a highly appreciative essay about him, entitled, "The Humorous Saint."
Psalm 131

Way more important than the manner of our death or our tribulations before it, WAY more important is the love that God has for us and that he commands us to share with one another.

I am depressed and irascible enough to need the example of such a self-deprecating and good-humored guy as Philip Neri was. I commend his example to all of us.

105 posted on 05/26/2009 6:08:18 AM PDT by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Quix; Alamo-Girl; Mad Dawg; hosepipe; MHGinTN; DarthVader; Blogger; P-Marlowe; wmfights; TaraP; ...
What I think many authentic Believers are still unprepared for . . . is how many of their closer friends and “Christian” “brothers and sisters” will also end up decidedly on the side of OThuga, his Gestapo, the satanic world government etc.

Oh, yes that's clear to me too, Quix. And they will likely have great "credentials"; e.g., degree(s) from institutions such as the University of Notre Dame. [The dirty little secret of many of these types is that they commonly believe they are "fit" to be the masters of everybody else, i.e., the "common man," whom they consider to be "unfit" because less intelligent than they. So unfit, in fact, that they cannot be trusted to run their own lives in liberty. Here we see a pridefulness and hardness of heart that is "sympatico" with the very spirit of the OThuga administration, not to mention its political objectives.]

Such people have been so seduced by the powers of the world that they are literally spiritually blind. They are taught to believe that man himself can fix all the problems of humanity. They have utter confidence in man and his reason. Yet though they may have "knowledge," it may be of questionable character because of its very presupposition: that man is the measure and the capable fixer of all problems human, personal and social.

What they do not have is wisdom. For their understanding is collapsed to the measure (the "number") of a man. Revelation 13:18:

Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

* * * * * * *

Quix, regarding Christians generally, clearly you see a sheep-and-goats type of division. Me too FWIW. But we are here speaking of a division in the Body of Christ itself. It doesn't look to be about to heal itself anytime soon. You seem to suggest that it's a complete waste of time for the sheep to be evangelizing the goats (which is what they so desperately need to shed their "goatdom," so to live as men under God, now and in the eternal hereafter). It seems like such a waste of time. And yet Christians are under obligation to preach the Lord, the Good News of salvation, to all men. Thus Christians give living witness unto the glory of God and His indwelling Spirit, which is Life and Truth....

In any case, we must love our neighbor.

Quix, you wrote about the "more or less unfettered yet very discerning OPENNESS !!!!TO THE LORD!!!! " as the mark of a true Christian, who:

...[doesn’t] have THE LORD in [his] own personal nor organizational tidy little box. They are quick to cast aside UNBiblical stuff—yet they are open to The Lord doing whatever The Lord wants to do as long as it’s THE LORD.

Our doctrines will never save us. We are saved only in and by Lord Jesus Christ, to the glory of God.

Skeptics and atheists perhaps would never be convinced of this. Yet then again, you never know — God draws whom He wills. (So don't let a personal judgment of "hopelessless" regarding another person's spiritual condition get in the way.)

However, you'd think that you could convince a "nominal" Christian of this.

Personally, I think if a Christian is not "convinceable" on this point, he should just do us all a favor any stop calling himself a "Christian." It just adds to the "epistemological confusion" — what you might call the "Tower of Babel Effect" — that is so plaguing and undermining the very foundations of society, not to mention the widescale destruction of souls it entails.

I guess I'm just rambling here. Just wanted to let you know there's another spirit out here that agrees with your general assessment, and is deeply disturbed about the developments you describe (for, like you, I can see where they lead).

Thank you so very much dear brother in Christ, for your outstandingly perceptive and insightful essay/post!

p.s.: Just in case anyone hasn't noticed this, "OThuga" has been working overtime to co-opt Christians institutions and understandings, and a prime target is the Roman Catholic Church. He'll invoke these corrupt "Catholics" as approving and justifying his anti-God policies, as fellow "team members" on "Team Progress" as "we" go forward in "changing" the human future. Indeed, as you say Quix, these are "dead men walking." At the very least, they are idolators; i.e., people who have fallen away from the one Great Commandment: To love God with all one's heart, and mind, and soul, and strength.

It appears many people today love OThuga more. Which reminds me of Nazi Germany. As you'll recall, Hitler also worked overtime to co-opt the German Church, to make it a "department" of his government that would "promote" his fascist ideology and policies. Sadly, he was pretty successful with that effort — the Barman Declaration notwithstanding. Otherwise, how can one explain how the "most Christian nation" in all of Europe could stand mute while millions of innocent people, Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, disabled persons, et al., were being systematically slaughtered?

106 posted on 05/26/2009 9:51:07 AM PDT by betty boop (Tyranny is always whimsical. — Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Quix; Alamo-Girl; Mad Dawg; hosepipe; MHGinTN; DarthVader; Blogger; P-Marlowe; wmfights; TaraP
Most RC responses are some variation of MY DADDY IS !!!!TOO!!!! BIGGER THAN YOUR DADDY, SO HARUMPH [sticks tongue out]!

Dear brother in Christ, that observation seems most unworthy of you. In my very humble opinion. For whatever it's worth.

"Where there is hatred, let me sow love; where there is injury, pardon...." seems a better way for a Christian to go, whether he be Protestant or Catholic. For there is only One Body of Christ....

107 posted on 05/26/2009 10:01:53 AM PDT by betty boop (Tyranny is always whimsical. — Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: betty boop; Quix; Alamo-Girl
[ "Where there is hatred, let me sow love; where there is injury, pardon...." seems a better way for a Christian to go, whether he be Protestant or Catholic. For there is only One Body of Christ ]

A wise choice when visiting a sheep pen or not.. John ch 10..
John ch 10 seems imply(to me) that there may be Goat Pens as well..

Whether Sheep or Goat pens, the pasture outside the pens is the object I believe.. Ps 29

108 posted on 05/26/2009 10:23:14 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Amen, Quix. You are an obedient servant.


109 posted on 05/26/2009 1:25:56 PM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Quix
"No, I don’t have any personal criteria. And, No, I don’t decide on my own brilliance or personal discernment who is beyond the point of no return. And, mercifully, The Lord hasn’t made such an emphatic instruction to me all THAT frequently yet. It’s just been MORE frequent than ever before."

Funny you say that. Within this past year, I have been moving away from a few that I considered very close to me. I would never have thought that we wouldn't be close forever.

And the weird thing is, it feels "natural". It's very hard to explain. I know people grow apart, yada yada yada, but this is different. I find myself getting very defensive of the Lord and my Bible.

I'm sure He's not too pleased with my defensiveness, but I am a "beginner" and I think He looks upon me, as a parent would with a 2 year old, lol.

110 posted on 05/26/2009 3:09:34 PM PDT by NoGrayZone (The beauty of the 2nd amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it. T.J.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone
What you are expeiencing is that you smell.

2 Corinthians 2:15-16 (NIV)

For we are to God the aroma of Christ among those who are being saved and those who are perishing. To the one we are the smell of death; to the other, the fragrance of life. And who is equal to such a task?

111 posted on 05/26/2009 3:19:54 PM PDT by marbren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: marbren
"What you are experiencing is that you smell."

My first reaction was offense (I didn't finish reading).

Then I read on and whipped open my Bible......

For to God we are a sweet odor of Christ among those who are being saved and among those who are perishing, to the latter ones an odor issuing from life to life. And who is adequately qualified for these things? [We are;] for we are not peddlers of the word of God as many men are, but as out of sincerity, yes, as sent from God, under God's view, in company with Christ, we are speaking.

Thank you for directing me to that passage. I have felt a little guilty, even though I knew it was right, about my behavior towards my previous close ones.

I've marked it in my Bible. When I'm feeling guilty, I will refer to it. Thank you!

112 posted on 05/26/2009 3:41:50 PM PDT by NoGrayZone (The beauty of the 2nd amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it. T.J.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: betty boop

Thanks for your many wise-in-His-Spirit excellent points. I still hope to respond more at length.

Alas, I’m exhausted and still a bit ache-y and feverish. I’m going to take a shower and go to bed. Maybe later.

I also appreciated your exhortation later . . . though I probably have a different perspective.

BLESSED BE THE NAME AND WORD OF THE LORD

AND YOU AND ALL THOSE YOU LOVE.


113 posted on 05/26/2009 5:31:21 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Quix

H1N1?


114 posted on 05/26/2009 5:41:45 PM PDT by marbren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: marbren

Don’t think so.

Not really that set of symptoms, imho.


115 posted on 05/26/2009 5:43:10 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone
As you grow in faith that guilty feeling you mentioned begins to minimize.

1 John 1:7 (NIV) But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin.

Feeling guilty, you will learn, is inward looking. Jesus' blood covers and pays for all our sins.

116 posted on 05/26/2009 5:50:40 PM PDT by marbren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

Thanks tons for your kind encouragements.

I try.

Though some think I’m just tryING.


117 posted on 05/26/2009 8:58:32 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: betty boop; Alamo-Girl; airborne; AngieGal; AnimalLover; annieokie; aragorn; auggy; backhoe; ...
Thanks so enormously for your kind and meaty reply. What a treasure.

What I think many authentic Believers are still unprepared for . . . is how many of their closer friends and “Christian” “brothers and sisters” will also end up decidedly on the side of OThuga, his Gestapo, the satanic world government etc.

Oh, yes that's clear to me too, Quix. And they will likely have great "credentials"; e.g., degree(s) from institutions such as the University of Notre Dame. [The dirty little secret of many of these types is that they commonly believe they are "fit" to be the masters of everybody else, i.e., the "common man," whom they consider to be "unfit" because less intelligent than they.

.

Quite so. This is a hallmark of the globalist oligarchy. Actually, it’s a hallmark of the Religion of Science, as well. Certainly it’s a hallmark of evolutionists as well as of government ‘servants’—politicians [now to wash my fingers out] and bureaucrats.

Imho, as PRIDE GOES BEFORE A FALL, their unsurpassed arrogance will go before an unsurpassed thunderous fall . . . at Armageddon and some before. GOD WILL HAVE THEM IN DERISION.

So unfit, in fact, that they cannot be trusted to run their own lives in liberty. Here we see a pridefulness and hardness of heart that is "sympatico" with the very spirit of the OThuga administration, not to mention its political objectives.]

.

I think that the hardness of heart married with the arrogance is a particularly demonized state for any critter to be in. I don’t think one can be greatly angry, greatly arrogant or greatly hard hearted without being demonized—particularly over a long period of time. And for all 3 to reign in an individual fiercely—God have mercy—the degree of demonization is more than serious.

Such people have been so seduced by the powers of the world that they are literally spiritually blind. They are taught to believe that man himself can fix all the problems of humanity. They have utter confidence in man and his reason. Yet though they may have "knowledge," it may be of questionable character because of its very presupposition: that man is the measure and the capable fixer of all problems human, personal and social.

.

That’s extremely well put, imho. This is true IN THE MIDST of a generation post THE BOMBs of WWII as well as a lot of science etc. that was supposed to bring in Nirvana and utopian bliss . . . they have had ample EVIDENCE that their arrogance is ill-founded.

Yet, they scheme and manipulate on toward greater horrors than the world has ever known or ever will know, according to Scripture. Hideous to the max.

What they do not have is wisdom. For their understanding is collapsed to the measure (the "number") of a man. Revelation 13:18:

Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.

* * * * * * *

.

Well, we know that THE FEAR OF THE LORD is the !BEGINNING! of wisdom. And they are on the opposite end of things from fearing and having reverential awe toward The Lord God Almighty.

Their understanding has made a god of vanity—and of the idiots in their mirrors.

Quix, regarding Christians generally, clearly you see a sheep-and-goats type of division. Me too FWIW. But we are here speaking of a division in the Body of Christ itself. It doesn't look to be about to heal itself anytime soon.

.

Indeed. And that has come over me in waves of grief in recent months. It’s one thing to interact with “believers,” pseudo-believers at work etc. and fantasize that down the road, they’ll somehow get right with God. God will slap them upside the head sufficiently that they’ll wake up and make Heaven, after all. AND that WILL likely be true for some of them. PRAISE GOD FOR THAT.

Yet, it is becoming increasingly obvious that it will NOT happen for far more than I’d ever have thought to be the case. And that triggers the waves of grief—KNOWING deep in one’s ‘knower’ that NOTHING one does or says will make a bit of difference to their slide into hell.

Thankfully, there are many that one’s inputs; Scriptural discussions; FREEPER articles etc. do have an impact on—by God’s Grace, Christ’s Blood and Spirit.

You seem to suggest that it's a complete waste of time for the sheep to be evangelizing the goats (which is what they so desperately need to shed their "goatdom," so to live as men under God, now and in the eternal hereafter). It seems like such a waste of time. And yet Christians are under obligation to preach the Lord, the Good News of salvation, to all men. Thus Christians give living witness unto the glory of God and His indwelling Spirit, which is Life and Truth....

.

NO! I somehow mis-communicated. I’m not, per se, writing off a whole class of people with some sort of generic broad label. And, I would generally advocate taking advantage of virtually any opportunity to discourage someone from hell and encourage, even exhort someone toward Heaven.

I am noting, that GOD’S HOLY SPIRIT has begun—more than I’ve ever experienced before in my life—instructing me to leave some folks alone. My sense is that the reason is that

1. SOME individuals have reached such a point of no-return with God that God doesn’t want Kingdom resources wasted on them any further. What a frightful state!

And/or

2. Some individuals have reached a place where I, Quix, have nothing else to offer them. Others, may be of value to them. But I have nothing more they will receive and need to devote my time, energy and resources elsewhere as good stewardship for The Kingdom.

In any case, we must love our neighbor.

.

CERTAINLY. And, that’s likely to be essential even when we know an individual is unalterably hell-bound—all the more so, in some respects. That defines OUR character—along the lines of being Christ-like. However, I don’t know how far down that road Christ would have gone with most Pharisees.

Quix, you wrote about the "more or less unfettered yet very discerning OPENNESS !!!!TO THE LORD!!!! " as the mark of a true Christian, who:

.

...[doesn’t] have THE LORD in [his] own personal nor organizational tidy little box. They are quick to cast aside UNBiblical stuff—yet they are open to The Lord doing whatever The Lord wants to do as long as it’s THE LORD.

Our doctrines will never save us. We are saved only in and by Lord Jesus Christ, to the glory of God.

.

ABSOLUTELY. ABSOLUTELY!

Skeptics and atheists perhaps would never be convinced of this. Yet then again, you never know — God draws whom He wills. (So don't let a personal judgment of "hopelessless" regarding another person's spiritual condition get in the way.)

.

Please avoid misunderstanding me. It’s not, per se, a personal judgment of anything—least of all a person’s probability in missing Heaven. SOMETIMES THE LORD makes a matter clear about such a person. I’m learning still too slowly, at 62 years, to avoid arguing with THE LORD. This is not a FREQUENT occurrence but has become MORE FREQUENT than ever before in my life—in recent months.

However, you'd think that you could convince a "nominal" Christian of this.

Personally, I think if a Christian is not "convinceable" on this point, he should just do us all a favor any stop calling himself a "Christian." It just adds to the "epistemological confusion" — what you might call the "Tower of Babel Effect" — that is so plaguing and undermining the very foundations of society, not to mention the widescale destruction of souls it entails.

.

INDEED. Boy is that the truth.

I guess I'm just rambling here. Just wanted to let you know there's another spirit out here that agrees with your general assessment, and is deeply disturbed about the developments you describe (for, like you, I can see where they lead).

.

I can’t express well how much your kind response means to me. PRAISE GOD. It touches me deeply.

Thank you so very much dear brother in Christ, for your outstandingly perceptive and insightful essay/post!

.

BLESSED BE THE NAME AND WORD OF THE LORD and Praise to Him for any redemptiveness in any of my scratching.

p.s.: Just in case anyone hasn't noticed this, "OThuga" has been working overtime to co-opt Christians institutions and understandings, and a prime target is the Roman Catholic Church. He'll invoke these corrupt "Catholics" as approving and justifying his anti-God policies, as fellow "team members" on "Team Progress" as "we" go forward in "changing" the human future. Indeed, as you say Quix, these are "dead men walking." At the very least, they are idolators; i.e., people who have fallen away from the one Great Commandment: To love God with all one's heart, and mind, and soul, and strength.

.

PRECISELY. INDEED, that’s the truth. He’s an artist at it. The machine-literally-from-hell behind him is even more skilled at it.

It appears many people today love OThuga more. Which reminds me of Nazi Germany. As you'll recall, Hitler also worked overtime to co-opt the German Church, to make it a "department" of his government that would "promote" his fascist ideology and policies. Sadly, he was pretty successful with that effort — the Barman Declaration notwithstanding. Otherwise, how can one explain how the "most Christian nation" in all of Europe could stand mute while millions of innocent people, Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, disabled persons, et al., were being systematically slaughtered?

.

YUP. INDEED. Yet, the human critter is persistently of the mind-set—“WON’T HAPPEN TO ME! I don’t need to wear my seat-belt.” “I thank God that I’m not like that publican over there.” MY GROUP, church, congregation, family, person . . . is exempt from such troubles, flaws. WE’RE DIFFERENT! WE’RE NATURALLY [organizationally, habitually, practicedly, orthodoxly, ritually, labeled-ly] AUTOMATICALLY SAINTLY! . . . by definition.

And they fail to see that they have ALREADY BEEN seduced by lies from hell. They are ALREADY snared in satan’s trap.

Greatly appreciate your kind wisdom and insightful comments. PRAISE GOD FOR YOUR FAITHFULNESS TO HIM AND HIS KINGDOM.

118 posted on 05/26/2009 9:54:31 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: betty boop

I’m going to prayerfully ponder your kind rebuke and exhortation a bit more before commenting further. I want to benefit from every shred of your being accurate and right.

It may be the case that I did not communicate well at all.


119 posted on 05/26/2009 9:56:34 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

Quite so.


120 posted on 05/26/2009 9:57:04 PM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-188 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson