Replies

Can you with equal objectivity demonstrate the Expansion™ of Space/Time™?

LOLOL! Your use of the trademark symbols and the exhaustive list of eyebrow raisers suggests that it will be a complete waste of time to present this evidence to you.

Nevertheless, you asked. So I give it to you in several parts, the background and the latest mission (WMAP.) The third link is for technical reports (LAMBDA.)

WMAP: background information

WMAP: mission results

WMAP: technical papers

If you wish to ignore all of it, that's your choice.

“LOLOL! Your use of the trademark symbols and the exhaustive list of eyebrow raisers suggests that it will be a complete waste of time to present this evidence to you.” [excerpt, bold emphasis mine]

Oh contraire!

I find the evidence fascinating.

“Nevertheless, you asked. So I give it to you in several parts, the background and the latest mission (WMAP.) The third link is for technical reports (LAMBDA.)” [excerpt]

Based on the raw data, what we objectively know is what wavelengths are coming from a given direction.

I do not doubt that the scientists who collected the data, did their utmost to gather it accurately.

However, I find that their Explanation™ is lacking objectivity.

Their framework for interpretation is unverifiable.

“If you wish to ignore all of it, that's your choice.” [excerpt]

I don't ignore the verifiable data, however, I do not place my faith in their interpretation of same.

So, on the topic of Space/Time™ Expansion™, I'm going to remain skeptical. (sans objective verification)

On the topic of the very cool WMAP data, one conclusion that I find likely is that objects (ie, systems, galaxies, etc) within Space/Time™ are moving away from a central point.

But I am unaware of any way to objectively demonstrate that as a verifiable scientific fact ;-)