Replies

“LOLOL! Your use of the trademark symbols and the exhaustive list of eyebrow raisers suggests that it will be a complete waste of time to present this evidence to you.” [excerpt, bold emphasis mine]

Oh contraire!

I find the evidence fascinating.

“Nevertheless, you asked. So I give it to you in several parts, the background and the latest mission (WMAP.) The third link is for technical reports (LAMBDA.)” [excerpt]

Based on the raw data, what we objectively know is what wavelengths are coming from a given direction.

I do not doubt that the scientists who collected the data, did their utmost to gather it accurately.

However, I find that their Explanation™ is lacking objectivity.

Their framework for interpretation is unverifiable.

“If you wish to ignore all of it, that's your choice.” [excerpt]

I don't ignore the verifiable data, however, I do not place my faith in their interpretation of same.

So, on the topic of Space/Time™ Expansion™, I'm going to remain skeptical. (sans objective verification)

On the topic of the very cool WMAP data, one conclusion that I find likely is that objects (ie, systems, galaxies, etc) within Space/Time™ are moving away from a central point.

But I am unaware of any way to objectively demonstrate that as a verifiable scientific fact ;-)

On the topic of the very cool WMAP data, one conclusion that I find likely is that objects (ie, systems, galaxies, etc) within Space/Time™ are moving away from a central point.

From the inception - "In the beginning, God created..." - Gen 1:1

By "within Space/Time" are you suggesting that space/time pre-exists?

If so, what is your evidence?