That is, he is part of the very same system that he observes, and moreover his observation ineluctably "disturbs" the system he's observing.... There is a certain sense in which the subjectivity inherent in perception is not reducible to zero. And that is why, I suppose, the uncertainty principle (a/k/a/ the indeterminacy principle) is not confined just to the quantum world, but is a constant feature of Reality at all scales.
The only question seems to be is if there is some hypothetical being outside of space/time (reality as we know it) could other rules apply to that being? Certainly! Anything is possible in our imaginations! Heck we even invented God : )
“That is, he is part of the very same system that he observes, and moreover his observation ineluctably “disturbs” the system he’s observing.... There is a certain sense in which the subjectivity inherent in perception is not reducible to zero.”
What a load of post-modernist pseudo-scientific bunk. What, the only way anything can be correctly observed is if there is no context? What, we cannot understand that we are part of the context of everything we observe?
If our own existence and nature invalidate the certainty of any observation, all the observations on which the uncertainty principle are based have to be thrown out—thus, no uncertainty principle.
Sigh!!!
Hank
Where there is an observer, there is life and cause/effect simply by its making an observation even if the object observed is not apparently, directly affected (e.g. quantum measurement v. looking at a mountain.)
Thank you for sharing your wonderful insights, dearest sister in Christ!