Ice cores aren't going to show how the Cape formed......or how the Hudson River Valley formed.....or any of the other landscapes and water systems that were formed the last Ice Age........there's a reason why Minnesota has 10000 lakes.
The ice age DID occur.
So, the Grand Canyon was formed when Noah made his Ark, eh? The articles say otherwise:
In Grand Canyon, the "date" of metamorphism of the basalt lavas to form these Brahma amphibolites has been determined as 1690-1710 Ma (million years ago)
.....the argument is that, because radioisotope dating isn't as "exact" as they demand...then the young-earth theory is correct and the Canyon was created by the Great Flood. Such conclusions.....
Just read another of the articles and find their tactics fascinating and quite dishonest.
Evidence? The Burlingame Canyon in Washington that was formed in 6 days. Yes, it truly was. That means that the Grand Canyon COULD have been formed in such a short period of time, right?
Wrong. The Burlingame Canyon was carved out of "loess" a fine powdery, FRIABLE (reduced to fine sand easily) and really fragile sedimentary substance that cannot even be considereed "rock"......which is not what the make up of the Grand Canyon, so one cannot compare and equate the 2.
Their premise fails with even a cursory glance.
They agree the ice age occurred, they simply dissagree with the timing. They believe the ice age was a post flood event and a direct result of the ice age.
But if you believe “The science is settled”, “The debate is over”, “The scientific consensus is in”, just remember you have an excellent example right now in Global Warming of just how wrong and biased that consensus can be.