They agree the ice age occurred, they simply dissagree with the timing. They believe the ice age was a post flood event and a direct result of the ice age.
But if you believe “The science is settled”, “The debate is over”, “The scientific consensus is in”, just remember you have an excellent example right now in Global Warming of just how wrong and biased that consensus can be.
They believe the ice age was a post flood event and a direct result of the ice age flood.
Makes more sense now.
This doesn't make sense to me....the ice age was a post flood event and the ice age was a direct result of the ice age? You trying to say that the Flood was just a period between ice ages? (I'm not sure if there is enough "ice" to flood the entire earth anyway, but God could create water and then take it away)..............and your constant use of "they" tells me you don't believe as such?
My problem with the young earth theory and -ists is that it is exactly like the ID theory. They start with the conclusion that the Earth is 6000 years old and instead of actually looking for evidence proving it (because you cannot), they then try to poke holes in other theories and think that proves their pre-determined conclusion is correct. CArbon-14 dating isn't perfect down to the single year, so that means one can make it all up and be "right." Carbon readings say something is 200,000-300,000 years old.....well, that's too big a range, so 6000 is correct.
If you start with the conclusion that there is a Design......then ANYTHING complex or not understood at that time can be deemed "part of the Design"....more importantly, anything that shows any other theory to not be a perfect theory now proves ID to be true.
That very simply ain't science.
....and the GWT is bunk, generated by politicians and massive wads of research $$$$ to lefty researchers. Anyone in ANY scientific field can look at the raw data and laugh.