[Godzilla]

I have better things to do than argue with you. I gave you information, all of which can be found quite easily on the web. If you have any interest in looking for it, you know have enough information to google it and find it. If you prefer to keep believing in fairy tales, without ever searching for the truth, that’s your choice also.

True, very true. It is not just one line of dna/genetic study that disproves the Lamamite-American Indian myth, but multiple studies such as:

Y-chromosome
mtDNA (mitochondrial DNA)
Polymorphic Alu insertions
Retroviral DNA elements
Intestinal microbial flora
Domesticated animals

To try to account for the lack a any physical, scientifically verifiable evidence, there are at least four theories for accounting where these Nephites/Lamanites resided:

Hemispheric Geographists
Limited Geographists
North American Geographists
Alternative Geographists

Yet the prophetic voice of the mormon presidency remains silent - allowing the unauthorized ramblings of the apologists to scramble everywhere to deflect the mormon sheeple from the truth.

[fproy2222]

To try to account for the lack a any physical, scientifically verifiable evidence, there are at least four theories for accounting where these Nephites/Lamanites resided:

+++++++++++++++++

Ya’ll said there could not be a place called Bountiful because Nephi could not have found iron close enough to the surface to to use to make tools.

Yet new scientific observation has proven that there is at least one place that could meet Nephi’s description.

So ya’ll’s “no place” theory is out the window.

Yet, like many other finds like this, ya’ll will ignore them because they do not match what you want the answer to be.

[fproy2222]

mormon sheeple

+++++++++++++++++++

And you wonder why people find you bigoted.

[DelphiUser]

True, very true. It is not just one line of dna/genetic study that disproves the Lamamite-American Indian myth, but multiple studies such as:

LOL!

and I quote "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence."

you guys claim it is.

Let's just say that this fallacy ridden logic is valid for a moment and play with some things I don't know.

I have no evidence that Godzilla is not gay...

I have no evidence that ChicagoHebrew is not gay...

I have no evidence that Godzilla and ChicagoHebrew are not rooming together...

Luckily, I don't buy the I have no evidence to disprove, so it's true line, and neither should anyone with two braincells to rub together.

Yet the prophetic voice of the mormon presidency remains silent - allowing the unauthorized ramblings of the apologists to scramble everywhere to deflect the mormon sheeple from the truth.

What truth?

DNA studies to prove the book of Mormon is true? Give it a rest, there is no Way to prove the Book of Mormon false with DNA, the Book of Mormon says they started with a genetically impure sample by including slaves in the party that set off and letting them marry in, not only that, but it speaks of meeting people who were already in the Americas and marrying in with them. The story line just does not support DNA verification in the negative.

If you guys understood DNA, and had actually read the Book of Mormon, you'd know that, but you don't or at least claim not to.

As for proving the book of Mormon true, you ignore the Middle eastern markers including Jewish ones common in pure descendants of Mayans to claim "nothing shows..."

Whatever, at least you guys are amusing.