You wrote:
“I didn’t post to you.”
I NEVER said you did. I said: “You posted in the thread BEFORE me.”
Why do you keep saying or implying I said things I never said?
“I posted to someone who posted this screed on this thread. That entitles me to address it here. What do you think the purpose of FR is anyway?”
I never said you shouldn’t post here. I said you might want to follow your own policy and address an email to Claveau and speak to him directly since that is what you have been hand wringing about in post after post. That is exactly what I said too: “Again, why aren’t you following your own dictates and addressing your complaints to Claveau directly?”
I never said or claimed that you shouldn’t post here at FR about this. Again, you say or imply I said something I never did.
“And did Baldwin post a letter calling this letter writer out?”
No, he instead made statements about the Catholic faith that were erroneous.
“Did he post a letter questioning this blogger’s faith and his Catholic belief? Please answer the question.”
Baldwin made statements about the faith of ALL Catholics - as posted in this thread by someone also opposed to the above letter as you are.
“Claveau is blogging. Here is FR and his letter was published here.”
Not by Claveau - unless annalex is Claveau and I have no reason at this point to believe that.
“His methodology I will use. He’s not writing to me directly he’s blogging. What now is the problem?”
Your hand wringing.
The advice is for him to stop badgering a fellow Christian with his propaganda. It's not about me addressing Claveau. Please stop with the nonsensical parallels.
Your hand wringing.
The only hand wringing here is your wasted type and misguided apologetic for this screed which is reducible to a propaganda piece of the worst kind.