Ah, that's an easy one. It is because Protestants on this forum really try to abide by the rules and not make this personal.
Your use of the term "sado-evangelist" when speaking to an individual is contrary to the rules of FR.
Further, your obvious pride in that terms speaks volumes.
What a farce. The rules are, by their nature, favorable to anti-Catholic bigots.
Your side constantly makes it personal by accusing a nebulous RCC edifice to which your targets belong by default.
Your use of the term "sado-evangelist" when speaking to an individual is contrary to the rules of FR.
And of course I haven't done that, or my posts with that term would have been pulled, now wouldn't they.
But you already know that, don't you?
Further, your obvious pride in that terms speaks volumes.
It does do a spectacular job of conveying the perverse character of the "accusers for Jesus"
Nevertheless, the term is not of my invention, so "pride," much as some would dearly wish was a component of my usage, is an empty accusation.
AMEN.