Written like an authentic rep of the professional hyper history manglers of the RC edifice! LOL.
Written like an authentic rep of the professional hyper history manglers of the RC edifice! LOL.
You wrote:
“Written like an authentic rep of the professional hyper history manglers of the RC edifice! LOL.”
Here we see the typical Protestant fear of being called on something cloaked as anti-intellectualism. If a Protestant brings up something from history and clearly misunderstands it - or even falsely states what happened (e.g. about Copernicus) - then there’s something wrong with a Catholic (who also happens to be a historian) calling him on it? So you don’t believe that errors whould be noted or corrected, right? You must be getting ready to vote for gaffe master Obama with that attitude. But thanks for so perfectly modeling what Protestants are really like in debates about factual events - they could care less about what actually happened. Don’t bother them with the facts when a helpful myth makes them feel warm and comfy in their self-righteousness.