From that thread.....
To: stfassisi
I hope the record is adequately clear here: None of this involves referring to Mary as “Redemptrix.” Claims to the contrary are false.
34 posted on Monday, September 10, 2007 12:52:46 PM by Petronski (Cleveland Indians: Pennant -14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
The thread WAS adequately clear, but no amount of clarity can prevent the most scabrous lies from belching forth from some quarters nonetheless.
It is a fetish, its victims pitiful.
To: stfassisi
I hope the record is adequately clear here: None of this involves referring to Mary as "Redemptrix." Claims to the contrary are false.
Claims to the contrary? You mean the claims by Padre Pio???
How does the Catholic apologist expect to be taken seriously when they make a statment like that? The thread clearly says, over and over, that Mary is the "co-redemptrix."
It's even in the title!!!
Co-chairmen share the office and duties and work of chairman.
Likewise, the RCC would have us believe "co-redeemers" share the office and duties and work of redeemer.
Blasphemy.