[Dr. Eckleburg]

From that thread.....

To: stfassisi

I hope the record is adequately clear here: None of this involves referring to Mary as "Redemptrix." Claims to the contrary are false.

Claims to the contrary? You mean the claims by Padre Pio???

How does the Catholic apologist expect to be taken seriously when they make a statment like that? The thread clearly says, over and over, that Mary is the "co-redemptrix."

It's even in the title!!!

Co-chairmen share the office and duties and work of chairman.

Likewise, the RCC would have us believe "co-redeemers" share the office and duties and work of redeemer.

Blasphemy.

[1000 silverlings]

Not only that but there is no conjuction “co” in Latin.

[Petronski]

The thread clearly says, over and over, that Mary is the "co-redemptrix."

Yes it does. Now, let's review my statement:

I hope the record is adequately clear here: None of this involves referring to Mary as "Redemptrix." Claims to the contrary are false.

Did you see the difference?

Do you expect everyone else to ignore the difference?

[Petronski]

Likewise, the RCC would have us believe "co-redeemers" share the office and duties and work of redeemer.

Wrong on several levels.

[netmilsmom]

I do hope that you noticed that Padre Pio is not the pope.

I know there was some confusion about who is Pope and who is not, but I can tell you that Padre Pio was never a Pope. He’s allowed his opinion, but unless it comes from the Vatican, he’s out of luck.

No matter how many exclaimation points a poster puts in.