To: OLD REGGIE
But, my FRiend, that is not from the Vatican. They said “No go” even after many Catholics thought the idea of co-redemptrix would be just peachie.
2,919 posted on
06/05/2008 7:37:22 PM PDT by
netmilsmom
(I am Iron Mom. (but really made from Gold plated titanium))
To: netmilsmom; Quix; OLD REGGIE; 1000 silverlings; Mr. K; DungeonMaster; John Leland 1789; ...
Did you even read the links Old Reggie gave you? They are from vatican.va.
Pinging a bunch of you to Old Reggie's excellent post #2,907. One would hope this would quell the Catholic nay-sayers, but nothing has yet.
2,969 posted on
06/05/2008 8:21:32 PM PDT by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: netmilsmom
But, my FRiend, that is not from the Vatican. They said “No go” even after many Catholics thought the idea of co-redemptrix would be just peachie.
It is from the Vatican. Many things come from the Vatican which are not dogma. The "co" words are commonly used in the Vatican. That's the way they work.
3,037 posted on
06/05/2008 10:11:50 PM PDT by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
To: netmilsmom; Dr. Eckleburg; John Leland 1789
They said “No go” even after many Catholics thought the idea of co-redemptrix would be just peachie.
= = =
How long, approximately, would you guesstimate, that it would normally take for the magisterical elite’s political process to finally grind that out as a new approved, mandatory dogma—just as it did with the other Mary dogmas—the last one mere decades ago in the modern era?
3,071 posted on
06/06/2008 3:18:40 AM PDT by
Quix
(GOD ALONE IS GOD; WORTHY; PAID THE PRICE; IS COMING AGAIN; KNOWS ALL; IS LOVING; IS ALTOGETHER GOOD)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson