The Worship of Mary? (An Observation)

[Judith Anne]

Really? Stand by your claim or fall by it.

Reggie, I saw the claim. It's here on the thread for anyone to see. Not that far back either. Probably no one feels like going back to look it up, but anyone who doesn't believe it, can do it for him/herself.

[OLD REGGIE]

Nice change of standards, oh you-who-so-recently-bragged-of-knowing-nothing-and-now-claim-to-know-everything.

It's sometimes worthwhile to know what you are talking about before you go running off at the mouth. Proceed in ignorance.

[Petronski]

It's sometimes worthwhile to know what you are talking about before you go running off at the mouth.

I'm not sure what you're on about here, I know what I'm talking about and I'm not running off at the mouth.

As a Unitarian, do you believe in the Holy Trinity?

[Petronski]

Unless of course, your "original" Bible was written in English.

Your sarcasmeter is definitely jammed.

[Judith Anne]

Furthermore, demands for others to translate do not go over well, either. The information is probably available on Google; demands for others to go back two hundred posts just to find something that could perfectly well be found by the questioner are not fair, either.

If someone wants to reply, or ask a question about something several pages back, and it involves a subject covered earlier in the day from which everyone has moved on, it would be polite to ask, iustead of making a snarky remark.

Now, some may think I am thin-skinned here, or decide to call me names, but this is just common sense, FRiends. It is like being interrupted by children who demand attention when one is visiting with a FRiend.

Since the topic is so large, and the range of remarks even larger, a little common consideration would be nice.

But! I can live without it—I just tend to JUDGE people by how they behave online. That’s a fault of mine, which I cheerfully admit.

[OLD REGGIE]

Strange? Your Bible ends John 6 at verse 58? No verse 63?

[Petronski]

Christ is the Word made flesh.

[OLD REGGIE]

Reggie, I saw the claim. It's here on the thread for anyone to see. Not that far back either. Probably no one feels like going back to look it up, but anyone who doesn't believe it, can do it for him/herself.

If you had bothered to trace it back you might have learned Mad Dawg, in his haste, had addressed his post to Gargantua. It's called "firing from the hip". Fire away.

Further, Mad Dawg has no inherent right to insist on any private information concerning any one on this forum, let alone their spouse.

[Judith Anne]

Yes, there is only one poster on this thread who has never made a posting mistake. *rolleyes*

[Judith Anne]

If you had bothered to trace it back you might have learned Mad Dawg, in his haste, had addressed his post to Gargantua. It's called "firing from the hip". Fire away.

The obsessions of some are not the obsessions of all. Have a lovely evening.

[OLD REGGIE]

I'm not sure what you're on about here, I know what I'm talking about and I'm not running off at the mouth.

See my tag on #10839 (and prior). Pay attention before running off at the mouth.

As a Unitarian, do you believe in the Holy Trinity?

I have discussed it in prior posts and have no interest in playing your little game. The answer is available on FR. Look it up.

[Judith Anne]

Further, Mad Dawg has no inherent right to insist on any private information concerning any one on this forum, let alone their spouse.

A poster tried to "rank" Dawg using private information here on the forum. I wondered about that, myself. Anyone can say anything, here, and only the particular person's credibility backs up what is said. Maybe there was a question about that.

And do two wrongs make a right?

[Judith Anne]

Well, my mind is made up.

[Mad Dawg]

Neither do you have any right, inherent or otherwise, to characterize a question as insistence. What nonsense!

[Petronski]

No one believed the new one anyway.

[OLD REGGIE]

Furthermore, demands for others to translate do not go over well, either. The information is probably available on Google; demands for others to go back two hundred posts just to find something that could perfectly well be found by the questioner are not fair, either.

Am I to understand you think it is my job to do the tracing and leg work for someone who makes false or unsupported claims?

"Now, some may think I am thin-skinned here..."

Yes, I do. I think it is your responsibility to pay attention and have some understanding of the subject at hand before you go on the attack.

[Mad Dawg]

As the children say, “You’re not the boss of me.” You go stand or fall. I already have a life.

[Petronski]

...no interest in playing your little game.

Very quotable.

[OLD REGGIE]

A poster tried to "rank" Dawg using private information here on the forum. I wondered about that, myself. Anyone can say anything, here, and only the particular person's credibility backs up what is said. Maybe there was a question about that.

I know nothing about that. If true it is completely wrong.

I believe it is up to each of us to divulge as much as we wish about our "private" identity.

And do two wrongs make a right?

That's the second time I don't know what you're talking about. :)

[OLD REGGIE]

Neither do you have any right, inherent or otherwise, to characterize a question as insistence. What nonsense!

"What was his graduate degree in and how many theology courses did he take?"

What nonsense!