[OLD REGGIE]

Reggie, I saw the claim. It's here on the thread for anyone to see. Not that far back either. Probably no one feels like going back to look it up, but anyone who doesn't believe it, can do it for him/herself.

If you had bothered to trace it back you might have learned Mad Dawg, in his haste, had addressed his post to Gargantua. It's called "firing from the hip". Fire away.

Further, Mad Dawg has no inherent right to insist on any private information concerning any one on this forum, let alone their spouse.

[Judith Anne]

Yes, there is only one poster on this thread who has never made a posting mistake. *rolleyes*

[Judith Anne]

If you had bothered to trace it back you might have learned Mad Dawg, in his haste, had addressed his post to Gargantua. It's called "firing from the hip". Fire away.

The obsessions of some are not the obsessions of all. Have a lovely evening.

[Judith Anne]

Further, Mad Dawg has no inherent right to insist on any private information concerning any one on this forum, let alone their spouse.

A poster tried to "rank" Dawg using private information here on the forum. I wondered about that, myself. Anyone can say anything, here, and only the particular person's credibility backs up what is said. Maybe there was a question about that.

And do two wrongs make a right?

[Mad Dawg]

Neither do you have any right, inherent or otherwise, to characterize a question as insistence. What nonsense!

[Mad Dawg]

If you had bothered to trace it back you might have learned Mad Dawg, in his haste, had addressed his post to Gargantua

Clarify, please. It seems to me that I forgot to include Gargantua in the address line and/or was confused by the fact that Dr. E had interposed herself into my conversation.

In any event I see it was Dr. E. who claimed the magnificent Jesuit education for her husband. Gargantua just claimed superior knowledge on the basis of having been raised Catholic, received my First Communion and my Confirmation.While she certainly has a right to refuse to develop the evidence she herself introduces to impeach me, I certainly have a right to ask for it, and asking one time is not insistence.

Further, when evidence is adduced and then withdrawn that is more provocative of speculation than no evidence at all. Why bring up the education if it is not relevant. If it IS relevant, why not develop it. As it is the Jesuit education though mentioned indicate nothing whatsoever about the quality of catechesis.

And that is not an insistence, it is an observation.

Have another beer.