Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Worship of Mary? (An Observation)

Posted on 05/30/2008 10:21:34 AM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007

Some of you will remember my recent decision to become a Catholic. I suppose I should be surprised it ended getting derailed into a 'Catholic vs. Protestant' thread, but after going further into the Religion forum, I suppose it's par for the course.

There seems to be a bit of big issue concerning Mary. I wanted to share an observation of sorts.

Now...although I was formerly going by 'Sola Scriptura', my father was born and raised Catholic, so I do have some knowledge of Catholic doctrine (not enough, at any rate...so consider all observations thusly).

Mary as a 'co-redeemer', Mary as someone to intercede for us with regards to our Lord Jesus.

Now...I can definitely see how this would raise some hairs. After all, Jesus Himself said that He is the Way, the Truth, and the Life, and that none come to the Father but through Him. I completely agree.

I do notice a bit of a fundamental difference in perception though. Call it a conflict of POV. Do Catholics worship Mary (as I've seen a number of Protestants proclaim), or do they rather respect and venerate her (as I've seen Catholics claim)? Note that it's one thing to regard someone with reverence; I revere President Bush as the noted leader of the free world. I revere my father. I revere Dr. O'Neil, a humorous and brilliant math teacher at my university. It's an act of respect.

But do I WORSHIP them?

No. Big difference between respecting/revering and worshiping. At least, that's how I view it.

I suppose it's also a foible to ask Mary to pray for us, on our behalf...but don't we tend to also ask other people to pray for us? Doesn't President Bush ask for people to pray for him? Don't we ask our family members to pray for us for protection while on a trip? I don't see quite a big disconnect between that and asking Mary to help pray for our wellbeing.

There is some question to the fact that she is physically dead. Though it stands to consider that she is still alive, in Heaven. Is it not common practice to not just regard our physical life, but to regard most of all our spirit, our soul? That which survives the flesh before ascending to Heaven or descending to Hell after God's judgment?

I don't think it's that big of a deal. I could change my mind after reading more in-depth, but I don't think that the Catholic Church has decreed via papal infallibility that Mary is to be placed on a higher pedestal than Jesus, or even to be His equal.

Do I think she is someone to be revered and respected? Certainly. She is the mother of Jesus, who knew Him for His entire life as a human on Earth. Given that He respected her (for He came to fulfill the old laws; including 'Honor Thy Father and Mother'), I don't think it's unnatural for other humans to do the same. I think it's somewhat presumptuous to regard it on the same level as idolatry or supplanting Jesus with another.

In a way, I guess the way Catholics treat Mary and the saints is similar to how the masses treated the Apostles following the Resurrection and Jesus's Ascension: people who are considered holy in that they have a deep connection with Jesus and His Word, His Teachings, His Message. As the Apostles spread the Good News and are remembered and revered to this day for their work, so to are the works of those sainted remembered and revered. Likewise with Mary. Are the Apostles worshiped? No. That's how it holds with Mary and the saints.

At least, that's how my initial thoughts on the subject are. I'll have to do more reading.


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic; mary; rcc; romancatholic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 10,341-10,36010,361-10,38010,381-10,400 ... 11,821-11,826 next last
To: Mad Dawg

They also use this belief that God hated Esau to justify their belief in selective salvation.

This is what happens when someone uses their own personal interpretation of Scripture and then teaches it as truth.

Esau thrived and that is obvious from the Bible but 2 little verses, taken out of context are used to prove that there are elect and non-elect.


10,361 posted on 06/30/2008 12:27:28 PM PDT by tiki (True Christians will not deliberately slander or misrepresent others or their beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10347 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Dr. Eckleburg
The Church's Bible says otherwise, I am rather disinterested what your insufficient, incomplete and heretical translation says.

Dr. E., is the NAB (a fully authorized Catholic Bible) your personal Bible?
10,362 posted on 06/30/2008 12:29:55 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10306 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
It can't be both.

It's all about YOUR INTENT. You believed you were wishing something on me quite horrible.

10,363 posted on 06/30/2008 12:30:15 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10359 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne; Quix

Judith Anne, I am with you here about that post...perhaps the one making that post, would care to explain it further for the slow-witted(that would be me)...because I am not sure exactly what is meant in that post...

By the way, Judith Anne, I am very glad to see you back, and I am quite sure, many many others, feel the same as I, regarding your return...


10,364 posted on 06/30/2008 12:30:51 PM PDT by andysandmikesmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10328 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE

Mark 7:15.

A lot of things are coming from within.


10,365 posted on 06/30/2008 12:32:12 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10356 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I try not to waste time with rhetorical questions like yours.


10,366 posted on 06/30/2008 12:33:20 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10308 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

Answered.


10,367 posted on 06/30/2008 12:34:31 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10310 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr

Fruits of the Spirit.


10,368 posted on 06/30/2008 12:35:57 PM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10365 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
I try not to waste time with rhetorical questions like yours.

How can it possibly be rhetorical? Do you adhere to everything in the chapter or not? A simple yes or no will suffice.

10,369 posted on 06/30/2008 12:36:01 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10366 | View Replies]

To: andysandmikesmom

10,370 posted on 06/30/2008 12:37:37 PM PDT by Quix (WE HAVE THE OIL NOW http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10364 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Judith Anne
No, your questions are answered.

It's just that a correct answer given according to the evidence of Scripture takes more time than the simple-minded responses from Catholics on the order of "sez you!" and "you're so mean!"

10,371 posted on 06/30/2008 12:37:56 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10315 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Thanks for all that vast Scriptural rebuttal.


10,372 posted on 06/30/2008 12:38:43 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10316 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg

This is about YOU proving man has no free will.

It can’t be done.


10,373 posted on 06/30/2008 12:40:05 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10372 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne; Petronski; MarkBsnr
Do you hope to be blessed as Esau was blessed or not?

Because Petronski and MarkBsnr have told us they hope for it.

10,374 posted on 06/30/2008 12:41:10 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10322 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; wagglebee

Not to mention all the time it takes to Scripture-google a few of the words so an answer can be cut and pasted.

I was just wondering about that commandment from Christ that a person must leave their gift at the altar, and go and make peace with their brother, THEN come back and make an offering to God.

So far, that has not been addressed. But never mind, I understand it, and faithfully observe it in the breech.


10,375 posted on 06/30/2008 12:41:46 PM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10371 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne

San Francisco cereal, you mean?


10,376 posted on 06/30/2008 12:41:47 PM PDT by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10368 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
How can it possibly be rhetorical?

Simple: if the issue of believing the entirety of First Timothy has never come up in reality.

10,377 posted on 06/30/2008 12:42:43 PM PDT by Petronski (Scripture & Tradition must be accepted & honored w/equal sentiments of devotion & reverence. CCC 82)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10369 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr

ROFL! Took me by surprise! :D


10,378 posted on 06/30/2008 12:42:45 PM PDT by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10376 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
No, your questions are answered.

No, it is not!

Do you yourself conform to ALL of Saint Paul's mandates in the second chapter of his First Epistle to Timothy? YES or NO.

10,379 posted on 06/30/2008 12:43:00 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10371 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

I meant to go on. In Luke, Jesus says; “If anyone comes to me and does not HATE his father and mother, his wife and children, his brother and sisters –yes, even his own life –he cannot be my disciple.”

So we should disregard one of the Ten Commandments? Then there is Jesus’ Commandment that we love God above all and our neighbors as ourselves should be thrown by the wayside?

If we disregard those 2 things do we also disregard the one about loving God above all?

I’d hate to be a Calvinist and think that most of my family and friends are probably going to hell.


10,380 posted on 06/30/2008 12:43:12 PM PDT by tiki (True Christians will not deliberately slander or misrepresent others or their beliefs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10347 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 10,341-10,36010,361-10,38010,381-10,400 ... 11,821-11,826 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson