Replies

He's big (even bigger than my posts), He's bad (He has called me names a few times), he's mean (he has never apologized or admitted that he was wrong even when proven so), He breaths fire, OK well not actual fire... (just having fun with the name...)

I believe Godzilla is antiquated, his views are steeped in tradition, and his methods do not take into account new findings, or modern methodology he is stuck on information being peer reviewed and not just whether or not it is true (the Bible was not peer reviewed... a peer review does not make something true, ask the flat earth society, they have peers who review their stuff). From my perspective, he denies the word of God in favor of the doctrines of men for money.

Hi DU, you must be talking about yourself in the first paragraph (with the exception of the fire issue). So the next time I’ll remember to bring you some cheese to go with that whine. You are wrong on every count – except for the name calling – I guess the term Fluffy is incredibly heinous in comparison to what I’ve been called here by mormons.

New findings…… like the Los Lunas stone – rejected even by mormon investigators. You really don’t understand the meaning of peer review either do you? Flat earthers research would not (and does not) stand up to peer review – that is why they are ridiculed, like similar groups who tout foolishness. Modern methodologies like this one:

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/local/caribbean/sfl-flaearlyamerican0509sbmay09,0,5490437.story?track=rss

Or the mountain of dna and related evidence showing native American descent from Mongloid stock, not Semetic. Answers to FARMS/FAIR drivel are found below:

http://www.signaturebooks.com/excerpts/Losing2.htm

Infact mormon apologists have pretty much torn themselves up trying to explain or write off the results of research, divided up into Hemispheric Geographists, Limited Geographists, North American Geographists and Alternative Geographists. Why all the theory – because there is no evidence that the BOM is true and the at the peoples listed were ever here to begin with. More grins and giggles reading how they stumble over themselves here:

http://www.signaturebooks.com/dna.htm

Even your favorite cite – wilki – disses you:

Since the late 1990s and the pioneering work of Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza and others, scientists have developed techniques that attempt to use genetic markers to indicate the ethnic background and history of individual people. The consensus view is that the Native Americans have very distinctive DNA markers, and that they are most similar, among old world populations, to the DNA of people anciently associated with the Altay Mountains area of central Asia, near the intersections of Russia, China, Mongolia, and Kazakhstan. There is little significant support outside the LDS for the hypothesis that these peoples originated as migrants from the Middle East.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetics_and_the_Book_of_Mormon

Is this recent and modern enough for you DU, or are you stuck in the traditions of a man?

How about modern Egyptology and the BOA scroll (aka Book of Breathing). Do you really want to explore tradition v modern discoveries and research on this subject?

Traditions – nah, I’m not stuck on them DU, the one stuck is looking at you in your mirror :)

Since it appears you haven’t made it to post 1190 in your responses, my profile has been on line for 4 years available for all to look at. That is hardly hiding it. But it has brought me numerous grins and giggles at how you attempt to slander me by calling me a paid theologian. I await your apology

I believe Godzilla is antiquated, his views are steeped in tradition, and his methods do not take into account new findings, or modern methodology... [DU]

(Oh, you mean "antiquated" notions like DelphiUser's defense of ancient practices instigated & rooted in the person of Lamech, the initial polygamist who was a violent Cainite? You mean DelphiUser's defense of ancient pagan customs like polygamy largely passed down thru the pagan custom of ancient Mesopotamia?)

You don't mean to say that DelphiUser never could shed the skin of polygamous traditions of which scatter across his heritage, do you? Do you mean to say his method of reading history backwards, from front to back, revisionist style, sought to impose "new findings" on the institution of marriage? All when the Old Testament made it quite clear that the Israelites viewed monogamy as the most acceptable form of marriage -- stated openly in Deut. 17:17 & Gen. 2:24 + implied by Hebrew laws in Ex. 20:17; 21:5; Lev. 18:8,16-20; 20:10; Num. 5:12; Deut. 5:21???...and a practice, BTW, that New Testament Christians practiced as "THE" standard: 1 Tim. 3:2,12; Titus 1:5-7; 1 Cor. 7:2; Matt. 19; Gen. 2:23-25; Deut. 17:17; Lev. 18:18???

Why would he embrace an institution that was never New Testament Christianity if he was a true-blue restorationist? I guess that's what happens when you're "steeped in religious tradition."

I believe Godzilla is antiquated
________________________________________

I do too...

Godzilla is made in the image of God...

God is also called antiquated...

The Ancient of Days..Daniel 7:9, 13, 22

You go on and on about DNA, I added a whole new section to my page, just about DNA, here is the link, Does DNA from Indians prove anything about the Book of Mormon?

Go and read, hopefully you'll see why none of your flawed studies faze anyone who has actually read the Book of Mormon, we see it's flaws.