Posted on 05/03/2008 4:38:34 PM PDT by NYer
Scripture, our Evangelical friends tell us, is the inerrant Word of God. Quite right, the Catholic replies; but how do you know this to be true?
It's not an easy question for Protestants, because, having jettisoned Tradition and the Church, they have no objective authority for the claims they make for Scripture. There is no list of canonical books anywhere in the Bible, nor does any book (with the exception of St. John's Apocalypse) claim to be inspired. So, how does a "Bible Christian" know the Bible is the Word of God?
If he wants to avoid a train of thought that will lead him into the Catholic Church, he has just one way of responding: With circular arguments pointing to himself (or Luther or the Jimmy Swaggart Ministries or some other party not mentioned in the Bible) as an infallible authority telling him that it is so. Such arguments would have perplexed a first or second century Christian, most of whom never saw a Bible.
Christ founded a teaching Church. So far as we know, he himself never wrote a word (except on sand). Nor did he commission the Apostles to write anything. In due course, some Apostles (and non-Apostles) composed the twenty-seven books which comprise the New Testament. Most of these documents are ad hoc; they are addressed to specific problems that arose in the early Church, and none claim to present the whole of Christian revelation. It's doubtful that St. Paul even suspected that his short letter to Philemon begging pardon for a renegade slave would some day be read as Holy Scripture.
Who, then, decided that it was Scripture? The Catholic Church. And it took several centuries to do so. It was not until the Council of Carthage (397) and a subsequent decree by Pope Innocent I that Christendom had a fixed New Testament canon. Prior to that date, scores of spurious gospels and "apostolic" writings were floating around the Mediterranean basin: the Gospel of Thomas, the "Shepherd" of Hermas, St. Paul's Letter to the Laodiceans, and so forth. Moreover, some texts later judged to be inspired, such as the Letter to the Hebrews, were controverted. It was the Magisterium, guided by the Holy Spirit, which separated the wheat from the chaff.
But, according to Protestants, the Catholic Church was corrupt and idolatrous by the fourth century and so had lost whatever authority it originally had. On what basis, then, do they accept the canon of the New Testament? Luther and Calvin were both fuzzy on the subject. Luther dropped seven books from the Old Testament, the so-called Apocrypha in the Protestant Bible; his pretext for doing so was that orthodox Jews had done it at the synod of Jamnia around 100 A. D.; but that synod was explicitly anti-Christian, and so its decisions about Scripture make an odd benchmark for Christians.
Luther's real motive was to get rid of Second Maccabees, which teaches the doctrine of Purgatory. He also wanted to drop the Letter of James, which he called "an epistle of straw," because it flatly contradicts the idea of salvation by "faith alone" apart from good works. He was restrained by more cautious Reformers. Instead, he mistranslated numerous New Testament passages, most notoriously Romans 3:28, to buttress his polemical position.
The Protestant teaching that the Bible is the sole spiritual authority--sola scriptura --is nowhere to be found in the Bible. St. Paul wrote to Timothy that Scripture is "useful" (which is an understatemtn), but neither he nor anyone else in the early Church taught sola scriptura. And, in fact, nobody believed it until the Reformation. Newman called the idea that God would let fifteen hundred years pass before revealing that the bible was the sole teaching authority for Christians an "intolerable paradox."
Newman also wrote: "It is antecedently unreasonable to Bsuppose that a book so complex, so unsystematic, in parts so obscure, the outcome of so many minds, times, and places, should be given us from above without the safeguard of some authority; as if it could possibly, from the nature of the case, interpret itself...." And, indeed, once they had set aside the teaching authority of the Church, the Reformers began to argue about key Scriptural passages. Luther and Zwingli, for example, disagreed vehemently about what Christ meant by the words, "This is my Body."
St. Augustine, usually Luther's guide and mentor, ought to have the last word about sola scriptura: "But for the authority of the Church, I would not believe the Gospel."
BASE and FALSE ACCUSATIONS fool no one whose eyes
have been opened to
TRUTH
In spite of the many vicious lies being told about me on this thread I remain undiscouraged, thanks to the consolation of Blessed Mary, Ever-Virgin, Co-Redemptrix, and her Son, Jesus Christ my Savior.
It must be plain to all by now just who are disruptors and who are serious students of theology.
It is implied. How is a post to another personal upon you?
Did I claim it was personal upon me?
Indeed. Catholics win again!
Alrighty then. How was my post "personal" at all?
Did I claim it was personal?
Can you see now the hazards of mind reading? No doubt that is why it is against the rules.
Yes. What other purpose for your post?
As opposed to what was going on, before?
In what possible way was I "mind reading"?
You are putting words in my mouth.
The purpose of my post is exactly what I said in my post.
Falsely telling me the purpose of my post.
2,003 posted on Saturday, May 10, 2008 2:57:41 PM by roamer_1
Gee, that seems personal.
Unless you really want to discuss the scriptures, please refrain from posting little potshots at me, as I am not inerested in a flamewar with either one of you, thanks in advance.
*********************
Protestantism and all other misguided religions created by man must never stop fighting to obscure the truth, lest their house of cards be seen for what it is, a false construction, a wrong turn on the path to salvation.
Imagine having one's entire spiritual life focused on denying that Christ Himself began the One True Church, and that all others are not the way He has chosen for us.
Satan is the father of lies.
Note that our separated brethen, through the dark fog of heresy, find it impossible to discern what any child
of five years of age
Could tell them.
Yet they attack, blame, whine, cry, bleat like goats
WHENEVER
they see themselves in a mirror....
Sad, really. And yet, I bear no malice in my heart, but pray that they may be enligtened.
may Christ above absolve them, send them true disciples to teach them, and bring them to full fellowship with the saints.
Please stop your personal attacks, I am not interested in a flame war. I am happy to discuss Sola scriptura, I am not interested in what you perpetuate here. thanks again
may Christ above absolve them, send them true disciples to teach them, and bring them to full fellowship with the saints.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.