Re: By all means let the discussion continue. Unfortunately there’s not much substance I see to discuss. This article reads more like a PR release than a news story.
But please, continue.
Please review my posts #7 & #25. I in no way endorse the veracity of the original posted article.
This came from a fire side which I am sure more information was given at the time someone just put it in the Mormon times news.
I appreciate you difference but much still isn’t conclusive on your side to be so sure!
Understood, and my comment was general and not indicative that you espoused the article’s conclusions, merely encouraging any discussion for those who wished to do so.
Thanks.