To: Alex Murphy; pgyanke; OLD REGGIE; Dr. Eckleburg; Gamecock; HarleyD
pgyanke:
There is more than one meaning to nearly every verse in the Bible. There can be multiple proximate meanings and a greater, eternal meaning. A. Murphy: I've never seen any Catholic on FR claim this view before now.
Seems to me that pgyanke is speaking the truth, in spite of what is often said here on FR by other Catholics.
Let's look at divorce. Scripture forbids it. The RC church forbids it. But, we all know that there needs to be a mechanism to allow a marriage to break up. Voila! Let's invent something called an annulment and have Rome mediate. Rome can allow a marriage to break up, but not divorce. This allows for multiple proximate meanings as defined by Rome.
962 posted on
04/29/2008 1:55:12 AM PDT by
Gamecock
("I find your lack of faith-disturbing" Darth Vader)
To: Gamecock; Alex Murphy; pgyanke; Dr. Eckleburg; HarleyD
Let's look at divorce. Scripture forbids it. The RC church forbids it. But, we all know that there needs to be a mechanism to allow a marriage to break up. Voila! Let's invent something called an annulment and have Rome mediate. Rome can allow a marriage to break up, but not divorce. This allows for multiple proximate meanings as defined by Rome.
"There is no teaching of the RCC which is so clear it cannot be denied, modified, or re-interpreted as required".
976 posted on
04/29/2008 9:30:25 AM PDT by
OLD REGGIE
(I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me be perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson