It certainly is, because it is used in lieu of an actual refutation.
Provoking an interlocutor is not a legitimate "answer."
I realize that the arrogance of the RC edifice's magicsterical PRESUMES that they are the arbiters of all that's true and holy.
However, in the REAL world . . .
I don't recall hiring them to define for me anything . . .
much less what a legitimate answer is to anything.
Try again. I'm not buying the phony rubberized constructions on reality proffered by the Roman magicsterical.
Hint: Your rubberized dictionary doesn't hold any sway with me, AT ALL. In normal reality that Prottys populate, words mean something. They aren't normally stretched far and wide to vainly try and fit them to every fool notion the magicsterical finds more convenient.
In terms of provocative idiotic assertions . . . I thought the RC magicsterical had a monopoly on that. We Prottys are just trying to hold our own with token replies now and then.