OH REALLY? I realize that the arrogance of the RC edifice's magicsterical PRESUMES that they are the arbiters of all that's true and holy.
However, in the REAL world . . .
I don't recall hiring them to define for me anything . . .
much less what a legitimate answer is to anything.
Try again. I'm not buying the phony rubberized constructions on reality proffered by the Roman magicsterical.
Hint: Your rubberized dictionary doesn't hold any sway with me, AT ALL. In normal reality that Prottys populate, words mean something. They aren't normally stretched far and wide to vainly try and fit them to every fool notion the magicsterical finds more convenient.
In terms of provocative idiotic assertions . . . I thought the RC magicsterical had a monopoly on that. We Prottys are just trying to hold our own with token replies now and then.
I realize that the arrogance of the RC edifice's magicsterical PRESUMES that they are the arbiters of all that's true and holy. It's no presumption when it goes unchallenged for fifteen hundred years.
I don't recall hiring them to define for me anything . . . much less what a legitimate answer is to anything.
No, you didn't, but then they aren't answering to you, anyway. The Catholic Church has historical precedent for it's authority: others do not.
In normal reality that Prottys populate...
Do you really want to go down THAT road?
In terms of provocative idiotic assertions . . . I thought the RC magicsterical had a monopoly on that. We Prottys are just trying to hold our own with token replies now and then.
Now see. There we have a splendid case of exactly the kind of deception I was referring to earlier. There is no Magisterium here: only me. For whatever unexplained reason "thinly veiled" is only a violation of the posting rules when a Catholic is doing it.
Personally, I take great pleasure from that fact, much more so than any hypothetical heavenly chickens, yet to hatch.