Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mary and the Problem of Christian Unity
Coming Home Network ^ | Kenneth J. Howell, Ph. D.

Posted on 04/09/2008 12:36:13 PM PDT by annalex

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 861-866 next last
To: OLD REGGIE

Thank you for your assistance.


341 posted on 04/10/2008 1:46:39 PM PDT by BlueDragon (here's the thing; do recognize the bell of truth when you here it ring, c'mon and sing it children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
Or one might say that some here are being overly interested in the physical life of our Lord's mother. Some might find that unseemly.
342 posted on 04/10/2008 1:47:01 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies]

To: Manfred the Wonder Dawg
No matter how many times you declare it, God has no mother.

Then Jesus, Who had a mother, was not God.

343 posted on 04/10/2008 1:47:11 PM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
Heck, you can go even further back. Try the Gospel of Luke. The Magnificat wasn’t just thought up by Luke. It was most likeley a song of praise that the earliest of Christians composed on behalf of Mary, based on its proximity to other “songs” in Scripture of similar thrust, and Luke’s reliance on eyewitnesses in writing the Gospel. What it boils down to is this: Christians were venerating Mary while she was still alive, and for Luke, one who was so close to St. Paul, to include it in his Gospel says a lot about her esteem among them. To deny that the early Church honored Mary does injury to the Holy Spirit, her Spouse, who inspired Luke to include this fact in his Gospel.

Excellent point,Dear friend

I wish you a Blessed day!

344 posted on 04/10/2008 1:48:10 PM PDT by stfassisi ("Above all gifts that Christ gives his beloved is that of overcoming self"St Francis Assisi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: stfassisi

>>With all due respect Dear Brother,you are basing your beliefs on your OWN interpretations and placing them above the Saints Interpretations ,some of who decided Bible canon<<

No, I am choosing which other mens interpretations are supported by scripture and which are not. I will not merely believe what another man sez because he knows more than me. Most of the followers of Jim Jones fall into that camp.

>>But hey, I guess you know more that Blessed Saint Athansius?<<

Probably not. But I didn’t know more than Jim Jones either (at the time) but I used my God given brain and prayer to interpret his words within the context of the bible.

Athansius was a mere man like me. He was not the end all. His words were not God’s words by default.

I do not blindly follow the teachings of any man for ultimately, they are not responsible for my relationship with Christ. I am.


345 posted on 04/10/2008 1:48:35 PM PDT by RobRoy (This is comical)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: Manfred the Wonder Dawg
It’s a mystery to mankind - how God came in the flesh to live among men to save us from sin.

Amazing, you can give faithful assent to the Incarnation, but not Mary's motherhood of God? Are not all things possible with God?

346 posted on 04/10/2008 1:50:21 PM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: Manfred the Wonder Dawg
That post didn’t interpret Scripture.

Of course it did. It called each of several Biblical Catholic teachings a "lie."

It called into light several spurious lies taught by the RCC that contribute to the deification of Mary within that organization.

Now there's a false statement. You play "the Game" very well.

347 posted on 04/10/2008 1:50:25 PM PDT by Petronski (Nice job, Hillary. Now go home and get your shine box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: trisham

>>Or one might say that some here are being overly interested in the physical life of our Lord’s mother. Some might find that unseemly.<<

That point is certainly not lost on me.

Some would imply that her having relations with Joseph would have somehow been “wrong” or a sin. Scripture clearly contradicts that. She was his wife. He was given strict instructions to keep his hands off UNTIL Jesus was born. Anyone who believes that meant for the rest of their life has no understanding of language, human nature, nor the biblical instruction for married people.

They are in some weird “dogma bubble”.


348 posted on 04/10/2008 1:51:25 PM PDT by RobRoy (This is comical)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
Dear Rutles4Ever,

Part of the difficulty is that we live in an age where most folks reject anything that is not material - whether they realize it or not.

Thus, someone says that being one’s mother means that one could not have existed prior to one’s conception. As if the mother and the father are the entire progenitors of the child. But that's not true.

We all have souls. Our parents did not bring our souls into existence. God did. Our parents only gave us our physical body, not our souls.

Yet, just because my mother didn't give me my soul, but only my human body, I don't refuse to call her my mother. We don't say, either, that she is the mother of my body but not of my soul, because mothers are mothers of entire persons, not of pieces thereof. My mother is mother of all of me, body and soul, even if she didn't produce all of me.

Similarly it is with Mary. It's absolutely true that she had nothing to do with “creating” the Divine Nature of Jesus. Yet, she is the mother of the entire person, Jesus Christ, and He is God. Thus, she is the Mother of God.

But the subtle materialism of the age obscures this truth, and makes people fall back into the ancient heresy of Nestorianism.


sitetest

349 posted on 04/10/2008 1:51:46 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: Manfred the Wonder Dawg
No matter how many times you declare it, God has no mother.

Jesus just beamed down to the stable, eh?

350 posted on 04/10/2008 1:52:01 PM PDT by Petronski (Nice job, Hillary. Now go home and get your shine box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: stfassisi

Same to you.


351 posted on 04/10/2008 1:52:05 PM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

This thread is just dripping with Nestorian heresy (among others).


352 posted on 04/10/2008 1:53:21 PM PDT by Petronski (Nice job, Hillary. Now go home and get your shine box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

Comment #353 Removed by Moderator

To: stfassisi
Perhaps I can show you that typology was why the early Christian's KNEW Jesus was God?

But your own evidence betrays you my FRiend! The theme of the "Son of GOD" is declared, no, shouted from the very bowels of the earth to the highest heaven! The Prophecy declares it openly over and over. No one need resort to typology to find proof of the Son of God as Messiah. One need only read Isaiah, or any other prophet to gain this knowledge plainly.

Typology is great tool for confirming book upon book, But a message of the order that you would have me believe is represented in Mary should not have to be calculated at all, but should be plainly written as is the case with all that I believe.

354 posted on 04/10/2008 1:54:50 PM PDT by roamer_1 (Globalism is just Socialism in a business suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

Bingo.


355 posted on 04/10/2008 1:56:22 PM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

Comment #356 Removed by Moderator

To: RobRoy

Believe as you will.


357 posted on 04/10/2008 1:57:48 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: roamer_1
, But a message of the order that you would have me believe is represented in Mary should not have to be calculated at all, but should be plainly written as is the case with all that I believe.

How, then, do you reconcile the Trinity or the hypostatic union? There's nothing explicit about either of those relationships in Scripture, yet I'm sure you believe in them...

358 posted on 04/10/2008 1:58:36 PM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: trisham

>>Believe as you will.<<

As we all are free to do.

Thank you.


359 posted on 04/10/2008 1:59:29 PM PDT by RobRoy (This is comical)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: annalex; Politicalmom
Indeed. That is a problem. You also refuse to think. Do you really imagine that after giving birth to God a "simply woman" would say, "OK, that's done, now that the angel's gone, let's make us some babies"

Absolutely, I believe that, except for your contrived trailer-park vernacular. Motherhood is a God-ordained vocation.

360 posted on 04/10/2008 1:59:54 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 861-866 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson