No, I do not need to proved “proof” of where I found the definition to Christianity.
You asked for a definition and I gave one, yet you dispute it. Thats fine, of course it is your right.
What I find interesting is your desperation to prove LDS are Christians regardless of the arguments that they are not in the traditional sense.
From my experience LDS do not follow the teachings of Christ but of Joe Smith.
From my experience LDS are not monotheists because they do not believe in the the Hold Trinity but separate The Father, The Son and The Holy Spirit, that makes them not monotheists.
I wish you well in your quest to justify that LDS are Christians, I profoundly disagree.
That’s fine. If you can’t back up your facts and opinions with authority, then I will take it as that: your opinion.
Your choice.
In catching up on this thread this morning, it seems that there is one important issue being overlooked: The LDS church officials in SLC have DECREED that the Christian community is by golly going to accept the LDS church as Christian, come hell or high water.
As one who has followed and taken part in these discussions for months, it has been obvious that any and all reasoned, factually-based statements to the contrary are to be ignored and those presenting the arguments are to be scoffed at and denounced.
There are several apologists, (you will know to whom I am referring) who are experts in the construction of straw men and circular arguments. I encourage the continued practice of presenting the facts, not with the aim of convincing the apologists, but with the aim of keeping the truth front and center for those who read these threads.
(I assume you meant 'provide'.)
Yeah; they are always wanting 'proof' of something, and when asked for 'proof' of their originals of the BoM, 'the angel took it away' is supposed to be sufficient for us.
I'm glad that God did NOT 'take away' any of the stuff we rely upon.