To construe such as sadistic indicates that for others to
cast ANY ASPERSIONS
on the ‘SACRED IDOLIZED OPINIONS’
of any RC rep
is to be sadistic.
Fascinating.
Well, certainly the RC edifice has to be the historical expert on sadism. I will have to concede that.
However, in this era, I think quite a number of folks will find that rubber dictionary daffynition to be quite outrageous.
I think we should all be aware of this new daffynition. Not that we need agree with it in the least. But it helps us understand the . . . perspective . . . of the RC edifice better.
Oh I think it's pretty cut and dried. What would you call someone who abuses another, then claims the abuse was for the good of the abused when the abuse is so obviously enjoyed by the abuser?
Then add the attempt to deflect responsibility for the abuse by claiming the vicitm is too picky...well, let's just say it's well traveled ground for those of us familiar with patterns of abuse.
As I said, no notion of nuance AND no real empathy. The S-E’s can fake it pretty well, but they don’t get it, not really.